Re: STV090x FE_READ_STATUS implementation

2011-05-24 Thread Guy Martin
On Tue, 24 May 2011 21:05:33 +0200 Sébastien RAILLARD (COEXSI) wrote: > > > > > In my case, the STV0903 is reporting the five following states : > > > SCVYL. > > > > > > > Indeed, after some more troubleshooting, I found out that the > > problem is not in the STV6110 but in the STV090X code. T

RE: STV090x FE_READ_STATUS implementation

2011-05-24 Thread COEXSI
Subject: Re: STV090x FE_READ_STATUS implementation > > On Tue, 24 May 2011 19:47:17 +0200 > Sébastien RAILLARD (COEXSI) wrote: > > > > Does the STV6110 supports reporting of signal, carrier, viterbi and > > > sync ? > > > > > > > I've done so

Re: STV090x FE_READ_STATUS implementation

2011-05-24 Thread Guy Martin
On Tue, 24 May 2011 19:47:17 +0200 Sébastien RAILLARD (COEXSI) wrote: > > Does the STV6110 supports reporting of signal, carrier, viterbi and > > sync ? > > > > I've done some tests with the CineS2, that is using the STV6110A as > the tuner and the STV0903 as the demodulator. > > The values yo