Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Saturday 20 March 2010 15:07:08 Oliver Endriss wrote:
> > e9hack wrote:
> > > Am 13.3.2010 17:27, schrieb Hans Verkuil:
> > > > If there are no further comments, then I'll post a pull request in a
> > > > few days.
> > > >
> > > > Tested with the mxb board. It would be ni
On Saturday 20 March 2010 15:07:08 Oliver Endriss wrote:
> e9hack wrote:
> > Am 13.3.2010 17:27, schrieb Hans Verkuil:
> > > If there are no further comments, then I'll post a pull request in a few
> > > days.
> > >
> > > Tested with the mxb board. It would be nice if you can verify this with
>
e9hack wrote:
> Am 13.3.2010 17:27, schrieb Hans Verkuil:
> > If there are no further comments, then I'll post a pull request in a few
> > days.
> >
> > Tested with the mxb board. It would be nice if you can verify this with the
> > av7110.
>
> Hi hans,
>
> it works with my TT-C2300 perfectly.
Am 13.3.2010 17:27, schrieb Hans Verkuil:
> If there are no further comments, then I'll post a pull request in a few days.
>
> Tested with the mxb board. It would be nice if you can verify this with the
> av7110.
Hi hans,
it works with my TT-C2300 perfectly. The main problem of your changes was:
Hi Hartmut,
After reviewing your patch I realized that more needed to be done to get this
to work properly. The core problem is that the probe function does not have a
counterpart that can do a cleanup.
So if the probe fails, then v4l2_device_unregister will never be called, which
is a particular
