Am Samstag, den 06.02.2010, 13:02 +0100 schrieb BOUWSMA Barry:
> I'm not even trying to follow this discussion at all, but I
> feel I have to chime in to be off-topic...
>
> On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, hermann pitton wrote:
>
> > > > > Bye bye Teletext. Nothing for future kernels, huh?
> > > >
> > > > Y
Am Sonntag, den 07.02.2010, 20:13 +0100 schrieb HoP:
> Hi Chicken
>
> 2010/2/7 Chicken Shack :
> > Am Sonntag, den 07.02.2010, 19:10 +0100 schrieb HoP:
> >> Hi Chicken,
> >>
> >> >
> >> > However I am still alone with the other problem I always stressed:
> >> >
> >> > When using alevt-dvb (I attac
Hi Chicken
2010/2/7 Chicken Shack :
> Am Sonntag, den 07.02.2010, 19:10 +0100 schrieb HoP:
>> Hi Chicken,
>>
>> >
>> > However I am still alone with the other problem I always stressed:
>> >
>> > When using alevt-dvb (I attached my overworked version 1.7.0 in earlier
>> > mails - please do have a
Am Sonntag, den 07.02.2010, 19:10 +0100 schrieb HoP:
> Hi Chicken,
>
> >
> > However I am still alone with the other problem I always stressed:
> >
> > When using alevt-dvb (I attached my overworked version 1.7.0 in earlier
> > mails - please do have a look at it!) the application hangs when you
>
Hi Chicken,
>
> However I am still alone with the other problem I always stressed:
>
> When using alevt-dvb (I attached my overworked version 1.7.0 in earlier
> mails - please do have a look at it!) the application hangs when you
> decide to switch to a channel that is part of a new transponder.
>
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 04:58 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 06.02.2010, 09:55 +0100 schrieb Chicken Shack:
> > Am Samstag, den 06.02.2010, 01:25 +0100 schrieb hermann pitton:
> 3.
> Also confirmed, your 1.7.0 version did work on a latest unpatched F11
> 2.6.30 without setting the te
Am Sonntag, den 07.02.2010, 04:58 +0100 schrieb hermann pitton:
> Am Samstag, den 06.02.2010, 09:55 +0100 schrieb Chicken Shack:
> > Am Samstag, den 06.02.2010, 01:25 +0100 schrieb hermann pitton:
> > > Am Samstag, den 06.02.2010, 00:39 +0100 schrieb Chicken Shack:
> > > > Am Samstag, den 06.02.201
Am Samstag, den 06.02.2010, 09:55 +0100 schrieb Chicken Shack:
> Am Samstag, den 06.02.2010, 01:25 +0100 schrieb hermann pitton:
> > Am Samstag, den 06.02.2010, 00:39 +0100 schrieb Chicken Shack:
> > > Am Samstag, den 06.02.2010, 00:12 +0100 schrieb hermann pitton:
> > > > Am Freitag, den 05.02.201
I'm not even trying to follow this discussion at all, but I
feel I have to chime in to be off-topic...
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, hermann pitton wrote:
> > > > Bye bye Teletext. Nothing for future kernels, huh?
> > >
> > > Yes, you say it. It definitely will go away and we do have not any
> > > influen
Am Samstag, den 06.02.2010, 00:39 +0100 schrieb Chicken Shack:
> Am Samstag, den 06.02.2010, 00:12 +0100 schrieb hermann pitton:
> > Am Freitag, den 05.02.2010, 23:32 +0100 schrieb Chicken Shack:
> > > Am Freitag, den 05.02.2010, 19:07 -0200 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> > > > Andreas Oberritter
Am Samstag, den 06.02.2010, 00:12 +0100 schrieb hermann pitton:
> Am Freitag, den 05.02.2010, 23:32 +0100 schrieb Chicken Shack:
> > Am Freitag, den 05.02.2010, 19:07 -0200 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> > > Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> > > > Andy Walls wrote:
> > >
> > > >>> As Honza noted, thes
Am Freitag, den 05.02.2010, 23:32 +0100 schrieb Chicken Shack:
> Am Freitag, den 05.02.2010, 19:07 -0200 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> > Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> > > Andy Walls wrote:
> >
> > >>> As Honza noted, these ioctls are used by enigma2 and, in general, by
> > >>> software running on
Am Freitag, den 05.02.2010, 19:07 -0200 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> > Andy Walls wrote:
>
> >>> As Honza noted, these ioctls are used by enigma2 and, in general, by
> >>> software running on Dream Multimedia set top boxes.
> >> Right, so reverting the patch is not
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 05.02.2010, 19:07 -0200 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> > Andy Walls wrote:
>
> >>> As Honza noted, these ioctls are used by enigma2 and, in general, by
> >>> software running on Dream Multimedia set top boxes.
> >> Right, so reverting the patch is
Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> Andy Walls wrote:
>>> As Honza noted, these ioctls are used by enigma2 and, in general, by
>>> software running on Dream Multimedia set top boxes.
>> Right, so reverting the patch is not an option.
>>
>> It also makes implementing multiple dvr0.n nodes for a demux0 devi
Andy Walls wrote:
> Originally the dvr0 device provided a single TS multiplex of PIDs while
> the open instances of demux0 each provided a single stream.
>
> The end objective appears to be able to have multiple different TS
> multiplexes from a single hardware (or software) demux.
Right.
> IMO,
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 14:19 +0100, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> Hello Andy,
>
> Andy Walls wrote:
> > After investigation, my recommendation for fixing the problem is to
> > revert the patch that is causing the problem.
> >
> > The reason for this is not that fixing the patch is impos
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 13:19 +0100, HoP wrote:
> Hi Chicken
>
> >
> > Furthermore: If it is technically possible to send and receive, demux
> > and multiplex, play and record complete contents of a transponder (i. e.
> > multiple TS streams) by using dvbstream or mumudvb (-> 8192 command line
> > p
Am Freitag, den 05.02.2010, 11:28 -0200 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> > Hello Andy,
> >
> > Andy Walls wrote:
> >> After investigation, my recommendation for fixing the problem is to
> >> revert the patch that is causing the problem.
>
> Well, the patch were already
Am Freitag, den 05.02.2010, 11:28 -0200 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> > Hello Andy,
> >
> > Andy Walls wrote:
> >> After investigation, my recommendation for fixing the problem is to
> >> revert the patch that is causing the problem.
>
> Well, the patch were already
Hello Andy,
Andy Walls wrote:
> After investigation, my recommendation for fixing the problem is to
> revert the patch that is causing the problem.
>
> The reason for this is not that fixing the patch is impossible.
> INstead, I'll assert that using the DMX_ADD_PID and DMX_REMOVE_PID in
> conjunc
Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> Hello Andy,
>
> Andy Walls wrote:
>> After investigation, my recommendation for fixing the problem is to
>> revert the patch that is causing the problem.
Well, the patch were already added on an upstream kernel, so just reverting it
will cause regressions.
If it is ju
Hi Chicken
>
> Furthermore: If it is technically possible to send and receive, demux
> and multiplex, play and record complete contents of a transponder (i. e.
> multiple TS streams) by using dvbstream or mumudvb (-> 8192 command line
> parameter), then I myself do not see the necessity to extend
Am Donnerstag, den 04.02.2010, 21:21 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
> On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 15:07 +0100, Chicken Shack wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 04.02.2010, 07:54 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
> > > On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 02:01 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
> > > > Am Dienstag, den 02.02.2010, 07:52 -0500
Hi Andy,
Am Donnerstag, den 04.02.2010, 21:21 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
> On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 15:07 +0100, Chicken Shack wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 04.02.2010, 07:54 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
> > > On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 02:01 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
> > > > Am Dienstag, den 02.02.2010, 0
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 15:07 +0100, Chicken Shack wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 04.02.2010, 07:54 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
> > On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 02:01 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, den 02.02.2010, 07:52 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
> > > > On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 10:11 +0100, Chicken
Am Donnerstag, den 04.02.2010, 07:54 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
> On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 02:01 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 02.02.2010, 07:52 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
> > > On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 10:11 +0100, Chicken Shack wrote:
> > > > Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 21:00 -0500 sch
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 02:01 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 02.02.2010, 07:52 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
> > On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 10:11 +0100, Chicken Shack wrote:
> > > Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 21:00 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
> > > > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 07:41 -0500, Andy Walls
Am Dienstag, den 02.02.2010, 07:52 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 10:11 +0100, Chicken Shack wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 21:00 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
> > > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 07:41 -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 10:56 +0100, Chicken Shack
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 10:11 +0100, Chicken Shack wrote:
> Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 21:00 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
> > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 07:41 -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 10:56 +0100, Chicken Shack wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > here is a link to a patch which br
Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 21:00 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 07:41 -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 10:56 +0100, Chicken Shack wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > here is a link to a patch which breaks backwards compatibility for a
> > > teletext software called al
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 07:41 -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 10:56 +0100, Chicken Shack wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > here is a link to a patch which breaks backwards compatibility for a
> > teletext software called alevt-dvb.
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxtv-comm...@linuxtv.o
Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 11:02 -0200 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> Chicken Shack wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > here is a link to a patch which breaks backwards compatibility for a
> > teletext software called alevt-dvb.
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxtv-comm...@linuxtv.org/msg04638.html
>
Chicken Shack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a link to a patch which breaks backwards compatibility for a
> teletext software called alevt-dvb.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxtv-comm...@linuxtv.org/msg04638.html
>
> The kernel patch was introduced with kernel 2.6.32-rc1.
> It was Signed-off-by B
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 10:56 +0100, Chicken Shack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a link to a patch which breaks backwards compatibility for a
> teletext software called alevt-dvb.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxtv-comm...@linuxtv.org/msg04638.html
>
> The kernel patch was introduced with kernel 2
35 matches
Mail list logo