-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/02/2011 12:03 PM, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A GPL troll, as the "Vicious Nokia Employee [that got] VLC Removed
> from Apple App Store" I cannot resist...
>
> Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011 19:23:26 Devin Heitmueller, vous avez
> écr
Hello,
A GPL troll, as the "Vicious Nokia Employee [that got] VLC Removed from Apple
App Store" I cannot resist...
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011 19:23:26 Devin Heitmueller, vous avez écrit :
> Am I the only one who thinks this is a legally ambigious grey area?
> Seems like this could be a
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Issa Gorissen wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We have ported linuxtv's cx23885+CAM en50221+Diseq to Windows OS (Vista,
>> XP, win7 tested). Results available under GPL and can be checkout from
>> git repository:
>> https://github.com/netup/netup-dvb-s2-ci-dual
>>
>> Binary b
> Hello,
>
> We have ported linuxtv's cx23885+CAM en50221+Diseq to Windows OS (Vista,
> XP, win7 tested). Results available under GPL and can be checkout from
> git repository:
> https://github.com/netup/netup-dvb-s2-ci-dual
>
> Binary builds (ready to install) available in build directory. Cur
>> Speaking as the maintainer and copyright owner I can say that it would
>> have been nice if someone had contacted me privately re the matter,
>> before hand. Not to assert any legal right, not for any approval,
>> simply as a courtesy and a perhaps a small 'Thank You'. NetUp could
>> have happil
Hello Steven,
On 01.12.2011 22:18, Steven Toth wrote:
>>> The point I'm trying to make: Someone made a presumably nice open source
>>> port to a new platform and the first thing you're doing is to play the
>>> GPL-has-been-violated-card, even though you're admitting that you don't
>>> know whether
Hello Laurent,
On 01.12.2011 20:42, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Wednesday 30 November 2011 20:58:40 Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>> On 30.11.2011 20:33, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> Am I the only one who thinks this is
>> The point I'm trying to make: Someone made a presumably nice open source
>> port to a new platform and the first thing you're doing is to play the
>> GPL-has-been-violated-card, even though you're admitting that you don't
>> know whether any right is being violated or not. Please don't do that.
Hi Andreas,
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 20:58:40 Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> On 30.11.2011 20:33, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> >>> Am I the only one who thinks this is a legally ambigious grey area?
> >>> Seems like this could be a vio
Hi Devin,
Thanks for this idea. Need to investigate.
Currently we've made porting and released the results without any
license violations in mind ...
On 30.11.2011 20:23, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
2011/11/30 Abylay Ospan:
Hello,
We have ported linuxtv's cx23885+CAM en50221+Diseq to Windows O
Hi Walter,
On 30.11.2011 21:46, Walter Van Eetvelt wrote:
Nice!
How is the CI implementation?
it's ok. Working fine under windows including MMI.
Professional CAM's (with multi-PID descramble) are tested.
Can both CI's be used by both tuners? Or
is one CI bound to one tuner?
First CI slot as
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> The point I'm trying to make: Someone made a presumably nice open source
> port to a new platform and the first thing you're doing is to play the
> GPL-has-been-violated-card, even though you're admitting that you don't
> know whether an
On 30.11.2011 20:33, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>> Am I the only one who thinks this is a legally ambigious grey area?
>>> Seems like this could be a violation of the GPL as the driver code in
>>> question links against a proprietary kern
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>> Am I the only one who thinks this is a legally ambigious grey area?
>> Seems like this could be a violation of the GPL as the driver code in
>> question links against a proprietary kernel.
>
> Devin, please! Are you implying that the wi
Nice!
How is the CI implementation? Can both CI's be used by both tuners? Or
is one CI bound to one tuner?
Walter
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:39:34 +0300, Abylay Ospan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have ported linuxtv's cx23885+CAM en50221+Diseq to Windows OS (Vista,
> XP, win7 tested). Results avail
On 30.11.2011 18:23, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> 2011/11/30 Abylay Ospan :
>> Hello,
>>
>> We have ported linuxtv's cx23885+CAM en50221+Diseq to Windows OS (Vista, XP,
>> win7 tested). Results available under GPL and can be checkout from git
>> repository:
>> https://github.com/netup/netup-dvb-s2-ci
2011/11/30 Abylay Ospan :
> Hello,
>
> We have ported linuxtv's cx23885+CAM en50221+Diseq to Windows OS (Vista, XP,
> win7 tested). Results available under GPL and can be checkout from git
> repository:
> https://github.com/netup/netup-dvb-s2-ci-dual
>
> Binary builds (ready to install) available i
17 matches
Mail list logo
