..@vger.kernel.org, hverk...@xs4all.nl, oneu...@suse.com, mche...@osg.samsung.com,
r...@spenneberg.net
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 10:32:12 AM
Subject: Re: Backport a Security Fix for CVE-2015-7833 to v4.1
Hi Vladis,
On 2016年04月15日 18:55, Vladis Dronov wrote:
Hello, Yuki, all,
My commit fa52bd5
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:01:19PM +0900, Yuki Machida wrote:
> Hi Greg and Sasha,
>
> Please do not accept patch of 588afcc to stable tree,
> because above patch has some problem.
> It reported by Vladis and Hans.
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/32798/
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-
enneberg.net
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 10:32:12 AM
Subject: Re: Backport a Security Fix for CVE-2015-7833 to v4.1
Hi Vladis,
On 2016年04月15日 18:55, Vladis Dronov wrote:
> Hello, Yuki, all,
>
> My commit fa52bd506f resolves CVE-2015-7833, as mentioned in
> https://www.spinics.net/li
all.nl, oneu...@suse.com, mche...@osg.samsung.com,
r...@spenneberg.net
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 10:31:17 AM
Subject: Re: Backport a Security Fix for CVE-2015-7833 to v4.1
Hi Vladis,
> I apologize for intercepting, but I believe commit 588afcc1 should
> not be accepted and reverted in the
, April 15, 2016 10:31:17 AM
Subject: Re: Backport a Security Fix for CVE-2015-7833 to v4.1
Hi Vladis,
> I apologize for intercepting, but I believe commit 588afcc1 should
> not be accepted and reverted in the trees where it was.
>
> Reasons:
>
> https://patchwork.linuxtv
Hello, Hans!
>> Having looked at it I agree that it should be reverted and I will apply it.
Thank you! I'm happy this is now somehow resolved.
Best regards,
Vladis Dronov | Red Hat, Inc. | Product Security Engineer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the b
t: Re: Backport a Security Fix for CVE-2015-7833 to v4.1
Hi Vladis,
> I apologize for intercepting, but I believe commit 588afcc1 should
> not be accepted and reverted in the trees where it was.
>
> Reasons:
>
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/32798/
> or
> https:/
Hi Vladis,
On 04/11/2016 02:03 PM, Vladis Dronov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I apologize for intercepting, but I believe commit 588afcc1 should
> not be accepted and reverted in the trees where it was.
Your patch requesting that commit to be reverted fell through the cracks.
Having looked at it I agree
Hi Vladis,
> I apologize for intercepting, but I believe commit 588afcc1 should
> not be accepted and reverted in the trees where it was.
>
> Reasons:
>
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/32798/
> or
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg96936.html
Thank you for your reply.
If it rev
Hello,
I apologize for intercepting, but I believe commit 588afcc1 should
not be accepted and reverted in the trees where it was.
Reasons:
https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/32798/
or
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg96936.html
Best regards,
Vladis Dronov | Red Hat, Inc. | Product
10 matches
Mail list logo