Re: ATMEL camera interface

2010-05-26 Thread Sedji Gaouaou
Hi, So I have decided to go with the v4l2-subdev API. I have taken the omapxxcam and vivi.c as exemple, but I have some questions... I still don't understand how to register a v4l2 device. I tried to copy the method from vivi.c using v4l2_device_register but it is not working? If I just use vid

Re: ATMEL camera interface

2010-05-03 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Sedji Gaouaou wrote: > Well sorry to bother you again but I am looking at the mx1_camera.c file, and > I wonder where are implemented the queue and dqueue functions? > > The atmel IP is using linked list for the buffers, and previously I was > managing it in the queue and dque

Re: ATMEL camera interface

2010-05-03 Thread Sedji Gaouaou
Well sorry to bother you again but I am looking at the mx1_camera.c file, and I wonder where are implemented the queue and dqueue functions? The atmel IP is using linked list for the buffers, and previously I was managing it in the queue and dqueue functions. I am not sure where I should take

Re: ATMEL camera interface

2010-05-03 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Sedji Gaouaou wrote: > Well I need contiguous memory, so I guess I will have a look at mx1_camera.c? > Is there another example? > > What do you mean by videobuf implementation? As I said I just need a > contiguous memory. I mean, whether you're gping to use videobuf-dma-cont

Re: ATMEL camera interface

2010-05-03 Thread Sedji Gaouaou
Well I need contiguous memory, so I guess I will have a look at mx1_camera.c? Is there another example? What do you mean by videobuf implementation? As I said I just need a contiguous memory. Le 5/3/2010 4:03 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski a écrit : On Mon, 3 May 2010, Sedji Gaouaou wrote: Hi,

Re: ATMEL camera interface

2010-05-03 Thread Sedji Gaouaou
Hi, I will try to write a soc driver(it seems easier ;)). Are the mx?_camera.c a good starting point? Regards, Sedji Le 4/29/2010 6:35 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski a écrit : Hi Sedji On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Sedji Gaouaou wrote: Hi, I need to re-work my driver so I could commit it to the communi

Re: ATMEL camera interface

2010-05-03 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Sedji Gaouaou wrote: > Hi, > > I will try to write a soc driver(it seems easier ;)). > > Are the mx?_camera.c a good starting point? In principle - yes. But think about one pretty important distinction - what videobuf implementation is your driver going to use? Are you goin

Re: ATMEL camera interface

2010-04-30 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
Hi Sedji On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Sedji Gaouaou wrote: > Hi, > > I need to re-work my driver so I could commit it to the community. > Is there a git tree that I can use? Nice to hear that! As far as soc-camera is concerned, the present APIs are pretty stable. Just use the Linus' git tree, or, if y