On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Tim Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Christian Wattengård wrote:
>
>> Ok. Too bad. Then why are DVB-T units, that needs more technology,
>> half the price of DVB-C units... Annoys me... :)
>
> That's probably down to economies of scale. Most people who have cab
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Christian Wattengård wrote:
Ok. Too bad. Then why are DVB-T units, that needs more technology,
half the price of DVB-C units... Annoys me... :)
That's probably down to economies of scale. Most people who have cable
will have been supplied with a receiver box by their cable
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Christian Wattengård wrote:
But after doing some research on Wikipedia and such, I can't figure
out why a DVB-T unit can't be easily modified to recieve DVB-C?
They use the same frequencies, the DVB-T specs support QAM (atleast low QAM).
My specific cable network uses 64QAM w
