RE: [RFC v3] Multi-plane buffer support for V4L2 API

2010-07-08 Thread Pawel Osciak
Ok, I think I have all the information I need for a v4, which will become quite a major redesign. I will repeat in this post what we discussed on IRC about for everybody. >Hans Verkuil wrote: >On Monday 05 July 2010 14:36:38 Pawel Osciak wrote: >> >> >We will also need

Re: [RFC v3] Multi-plane buffer support for V4L2 API

2010-07-06 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Monday 05 July 2010 14:36:38 Pawel Osciak wrote: > Hi Hans, > > thanks a lot for finding the time to comment on this. > > > Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > >On Thursday 24 June 2010 14:59:43 Pawel Osciak wrote: > >> struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane { > >>struct v4l2_pix_format pix

RE: [RFC v3] Multi-plane buffer support for V4L2 API

2010-07-05 Thread Pawel Osciak
Hi Hans, thanks a lot for finding the time to comment on this. > Hans Verkuil wrote: > >On Thursday 24 June 2010 14:59:43 Pawel Osciak wrote: >> struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane { >> struct v4l2_pix_format pix_fmt; >> struct v4l2_plane_formatplane_fmt[VIDE

Re: [RFC v3] Multi-plane buffer support for V4L2 API

2010-07-04 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Thursday 24 June 2010 14:59:43 Pawel Osciak wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to take up the multiplane discussion we had during the Helsinki > summit. > > - You can find a detailed description in my original patch series here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg15850.