Hi Sylwester,
My apologies for the delayed answer.
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 07:56:23PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 06/03/2013 03:25 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:41:50PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> >>[...]
> >I'm in favour of using a separate video buff
Hi Sakari,
On 06/03/2013 03:25 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:41:50PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
[...]
I'm in favour of using a separate video buffer queue for passing
low-level
metadata to user space.
Sure. I certainly see a need for such an interface. I wouldn't l
Hi Sylwester,
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:41:50PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> [...]
> >>>I'm in favour of using a separate video buffer queue for passing
> >>>low-level
> >>>metadata to user space.
> >>
> >>Sure. I certainly see a need for such an interface. I wouldn't like to
> >>see it
> >
Hi Sakari,
On 05/21/2013 07:30 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
Hi Sylwester,
My apologies for the late answer.
No problem at all, thank you for your follow up.
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 05/08/2013 06:26 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 04:04:10PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Hi Sylwester,
My apologies for the late answer.
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Hi Sakari :-)
On 05/08/2013 06:26 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 04:04:10PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 05/07/2013 02:35 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
A metadata plane works well if you have substan
Hi Sakari :-)
On 05/08/2013 06:26 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 04:04:10PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 05/07/2013 02:35 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
A metadata plane works well if you have substantial amounts of data (e.g.
histogram
data) but it has the disadvantage of re
Hi Sylwester,
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 04:04:10PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 05/07/2013 02:35 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > A metadata plane works well if you have substantial amounts of data (e.g.
> > histogram
> > data) but it has the disadvantage of requiring you to use the MPLANE buff
Hi Laurent, Hans and others,
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 02:09:54PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> (CC'ing Sakari, I know he's missing reviewing V4L2 patches ;-))
Thanks for cc'ing me! :-) I know I've been very quite recently, but it's not
going to stay like that permanently. Let's say I've been ve
On 05/07/2013 02:35 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> A metadata plane works well if you have substantial amounts of data (e.g.
> histogram
> data) but it has the disadvantage of requiring you to use the MPLANE buffer
> types,
> something which standard apps do not support. I definitely think that is
>
On Tue 7 May 2013 14:09:54 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> (CC'ing Sakari, I know he's missing reviewing V4L2 patches ;-))
>
> On Monday 06 May 2013 15:41:41 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Mon April 29 2013 22:52:31 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Friday 12 April 2013 17:36:16 Hans Verkuil wr
Hi Hans,
(CC'ing Sakari, I know he's missing reviewing V4L2 patches ;-))
On Monday 06 May 2013 15:41:41 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Mon April 29 2013 22:52:31 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 12 April 2013 17:36:16 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > This RFC looks at adding support for motion detection
On Mon April 29 2013 22:52:31 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> On Friday 12 April 2013 17:36:16 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > This RFC looks at adding support for motion detection to V4L2. This is the
> > main missing piece that prevents the go7007 and solo6x10 drive
Hi Hans,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Friday 12 April 2013 17:36:16 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> This RFC looks at adding support for motion detection to V4L2. This is the
> main missing piece that prevents the go7007 and solo6x10 drivers from being
> moved into mainline from the staging directory.
>
>
On Sun April 21 2013 14:04:26 Ismael Luceno wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:36:16 +0200
> Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > This RFC looks at adding support for motion detection to V4L2. This
> > is the main missing piece that prevents the go7007 and solo6x10
> > drivers from being moved into mainline from
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:36:16 +0200
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> This RFC looks at adding support for motion detection to V4L2. This
> is the main missing piece that prevents the go7007 and solo6x10
> drivers from being moved into mainline from the staging directory.
<...>
> Comment? Questions?
+1. I lik
15 matches
Mail list logo
