Em Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:58:23 +0200
Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> Hi Mauro and Hans,
>
> On Monday 26 January 2015 14:41:53 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On 01/26/2015 02:34 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > Em Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:11:50 +0100 Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> > >> On 01/26/2015 01:47 PM, Ma
Em Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:20:15 +0200
Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> On Monday 23 February 2015 10:55:08 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:41:41 -0500 Devin Heitmueller escreveu:
> > >> It is actually trivial to get the device nodes once you have the
> > >> major/m
Hi Mauro and Hans,
On Monday 26 January 2015 14:41:53 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 01/26/2015 02:34 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:11:50 +0100 Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> >> On 01/26/2015 01:47 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >>> The previous provision for DVB media contro
Hi Mauro,
On Monday 23 February 2015 10:55:08 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:41:41 -0500 Devin Heitmueller escreveu:
> >> It is actually trivial to get the device nodes once you have the
> >> major/minor. The media-ctl library does that for you. See:
> >
> > No objection the
Em Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:41:41 -0500
Devin Heitmueller escreveu:
> > It is actually trivial to get the device nodes once you have the
> > major/minor. The media-ctl library does that for you. See:
>
> No objection then.
>
> On a related note, you would be very well served to consider testing
> yo
> It is actually trivial to get the device nodes once you have the
> major/minor. The media-ctl library does that for you. See:
No objection then.
On a related note, you would be very well served to consider testing
your dvb changes with a device that has more than one DVB tuner (such
as the hvr-
Em Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:00:46 -0500
Devin Heitmueller escreveu:
> > For media-ctl, it is easier to handle major/minor, in order to identify
> > the associated devnode name. Btw, media-ctl currently assumes that all
> > devnode devices are specified by v4l.major/v4l.minor.
>
> I suspect part of th
> For media-ctl, it is easier to handle major/minor, in order to identify
> the associated devnode name. Btw, media-ctl currently assumes that all
> devnode devices are specified by v4l.major/v4l.minor.
I suspect part of the motivation for the "id" that corresponds to the
adapter field was to make
On 01/26/2015 02:34 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:11:50 +0100
> Hans Verkuil escreveu:
>
>> On 01/26/2015 01:47 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> The previous provision for DVB media controller support were to
>>> define an ID (likely meaning the adapter number) for
Em Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:11:50 +0100
Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On 01/26/2015 01:47 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > The previous provision for DVB media controller support were to
> > define an ID (likely meaning the adapter number) for the DVB
> > devnodes.
> >
> > This is just plain wrong. Ju
On 01/26/2015 01:47 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The previous provision for DVB media controller support were to
> define an ID (likely meaning the adapter number) for the DVB
> devnodes.
>
> This is just plain wrong. Just like V4L, DVB devices (and ALSA,
> or whatever) are identified via a
11 matches
Mail list logo
