On Monday 30 April 2012 16:15:30 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Monday 30 April 2012 16:06:16 Sakari Ailus wrote:
[snip]
> > One option is to keep the reserved fields as array even there was just one
> > of them or if it no longer was there. If so, reserved should have been
> > reserved[1] in the first
On Monday 30 April 2012 16:06:16 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 03:48:14PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Monday 30 April 2012 15:34:58 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > Remove input field in struct v4l2_buffer and flag V4L2_BUF_FLAG_INPUT
> >
Hi Hans,
Thanks for your comments.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 03:48:14PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Monday 30 April 2012 15:34:58 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Remove input field in struct v4l2_buffer and flag V4L2_BUF_FLAG_INPUT which
> > tells the former is valid. The flag is used by no driver curr
On Monday 30 April 2012 15:34:58 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Remove input field in struct v4l2_buffer and flag V4L2_BUF_FLAG_INPUT which
> tells the former is valid. The flag is used by no driver currently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus
> ---
> Hi all,
>
> I thought this would be a good time to get
Hi Laurent,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 02:48:23PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Monday 30 April 2012 15:40:24 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Remove input field in struct v4l2_buffer and flag V4L2_BUF_FLAG_INPUT which
> > tells the former is valid. The flag is used by no driver currently.
> >
> > Sign
Hi Sakari,
On Monday 30 April 2012 15:40:24 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Remove input field in struct v4l2_buffer and flag V4L2_BUF_FLAG_INPUT which
> tells the former is valid. The flag is used by no driver currently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus
> ---
> Hi all,
>
> I thought this would be a good
