I see this https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17834/ is delegated to
me. If I took ownership myself then it may have been a mistake.
Either way, the patch looks good to me and makes sense, but I am not
maintaining em28xx. Mauro, if you want to go ahead and merge his
patch then it's fine with me
Em Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:02:51 +0200
Frank Schäfer escreveu:
> Am 15.04.2013 18:50, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> > Em Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:41:44 +0200
> > Frank Schäfer escreveu:
> >
> >> I've just noticed that my 2 pending em28xx patches have got delegate
> >> assigned:
> >>
> >> https://patch
Am 15.04.2013 18:50, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> Em Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:41:44 +0200
> Frank Schäfer escreveu:
>
>> I've just noticed that my 2 pending em28xx patches have got delegate
>> assigned:
>>
>> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17834/
>> => delegated to mkrufky
>>
>> https://patchw
Em Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:41:44 +0200
Frank Schäfer escreveu:
> I've just noticed that my 2 pending em28xx patches have got delegate
> assigned:
>
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17834/
> => delegated to mkrufky
>
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17928/ (Obsoleted)
> => delegated to
I've just noticed that my 2 pending em28xx patches have got delegate
assigned:
https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17834/
=> delegated to mkrufky
https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17928/ (Obsoleted)
=> delegated to hverkuil
Ist this a patchwork failure or is the new submaintainers workflow
