Hi Gregor,
Let me know when you've branched 1.0.0. I want to merge Bård's work for qv4l2
(openGL support, upcoming audio support and other improvements), but I can't do
that until after you made the 1.0.0 branch.
Thanks!
Hans
On 08/01/2013 08:28 PM, Gregor Jasny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On
Hello,
On 6/14/13 9:15 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
IIRC the 0.9.x series were meant as development releases leading up to a
new
stable 1.0.0 release. Lately there have been no maintenance 0.8.x releases
and a lot of interesting development going on in the 0.9.x, while at the
same time there have be
Hi Gregor,
On 2013-07-25 14:36, Gregor Jasny wrote:
I saw your patches were merged to v4l-utils. Is there anything else
you'd like to have included in a v4l-utils 1.0.0 release?
Nope, that's all I wanted to have for this release.
Next thing will be to work on better diseqc support but it can
Hello Guy,
On 6/15/13 12:33 PM, Guy Martin wrote:
Can we wait a little bit more like a week max ?
I'd like to see the polarization stuff fixed because otherwise you
can't use sat at all with libdvbv5.
I'll work on the new patches this weekend. I'll hopefully have
something today.
I'll see what
Hello,
On 6/14/13 9:15 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
So how about taking current master and releasing that as a 1.0.0 release ?
I'm fine with preparing a 1.0.0 release.
But I'm under the impression that the libdvbv5 interface is not polished
enough to build a shared library from it. So I'd like t
Hi,
On 06/15/2013 12:33 PM, Guy Martin wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:34:04 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:15:02 +0200
Hans de Goede escreveu:
Hi All,
IIRC the 0.9.x series were meant as development releases leading up
to a new stable 1.0.0 release. Lately there
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:34:04 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:15:02 +0200
> Hans de Goede escreveu:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > IIRC the 0.9.x series were meant as development releases leading up
> > to a new stable 1.0.0 release. Lately there have been no
> > maintenance
Em Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:15:02 +0200
Hans de Goede escreveu:
> Hi All,
>
> IIRC the 0.9.x series were meant as development releases leading up to a new
> stable 1.0.0 release. Lately there have been no maintenance 0.8.x releases
> and a lot of interesting development going on in the 0.9.x, while a
I've got a fix for a really bad performance bug, so if you can hold
off on doing a release a couple of hours until I can get in front of
my Linux box and submit a patch, I would appreciate it.
Thanks,
Devin
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Fri 14 June 2013 09:15:02 Hans
On Fri 14 June 2013 09:15:02 Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> IIRC the 0.9.x series were meant as development releases leading up to a new
> stable 1.0.0 release. Lately there have been no maintenance 0.8.x releases
> and a lot of interesting development going on in the 0.9.x, while at the
> sam
Hi All,
IIRC the 0.9.x series were meant as development releases leading up to a new
stable 1.0.0 release. Lately there have been no maintenance 0.8.x releases
and a lot of interesting development going on in the 0.9.x, while at the
same time there have been no issues reported against 0.9.x (iow
11 matches
Mail list logo
