Em 10-01-2011 23:10, Oliver Endriss escreveu:
> On Monday 10 January 2011 13:04:54 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em 07-01-2011 21:56, Oliver Endriss escreveu:
>>> ...
>>> There are large pieces of driver code which are currently unused, and
>>> nobody can tell whether they will ever be needed.
>>
On 1/13/11, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> This seems to be a relatively simple patch, inline below.
>> This is against the linux-media tree, I could not figure out how
>> to turn it into a clean patch of
>> media_build/backports/v2.6.35_i2c_new_probed_device.patch
>> I did look for guidance on
Em 13-01-2011 02:43, Vincent McIntyre escreveu:
> On 1/12/11, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
>>> which on the face of it suggests
>>> btty-input.c
>
> already handled, my mistake.
>
>>> cx88-input.c
> the search string was in a comment
>
>>> hdpvr-i2c.c
> see below
>
>
>> I have no tim
On 1/12/11, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> which on the face of it suggests
>> btty-input.c
already handled, my mistake.
>> cx88-input.c
the search string was in a comment
>> hdpvr-i2c.c
see below
> I have no time currently to touch on it, since I still have lots of patches
> to
> tak
Em 11-01-2011 08:47, Vincent McIntyre escreveu:
> On 1/10/11, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em 07-01-2011 23:02, Vincent McIntyre escreveu:
>>> On 1/8/11, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>>
Have you tried Mauro's media_build tree? I had to use it today to test a
driver from git on a 2.6.35 kerne
Em 11-01-2011 08:37, Vincent McIntyre escreveu:
> On 1/10/11, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your script, but it seems specific to your environment. Could you
>> please make it more generic and perhaps patch the existing build.sh script?
>
> I was mainly intending to show how I hap
On 1/10/11, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 07-01-2011 23:02, Vincent McIntyre escreveu:
>> On 1/8/11, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>
>>> Have you tried Mauro's media_build tree? I had to use it today to test a
>>> driver from git on a 2.6.35 kernel. Works quite nicely. Perhaps we should
>>> promote th
On 1/10/11, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Thanks for your script, but it seems specific to your environment. Could you
> please make it more generic and perhaps patch the existing build.sh script?
I was mainly intending to show how I happen to do this. It's way too complicated
compared to build
On Monday 10 January 2011 13:27:09 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > ...
> > diff -upr /tmp/stripped/drivers/media/dvb/ngene/ngene-cards.c
> > /tmp/not_stripped/drivers/media/dvb/ngene/ngene-cards.c
> > --- /tmp/stripped/drivers/media/dvb/ngene/ngene-cards.c 2011-01-10
> > 10:01:49.0 -
On Monday 10 January 2011 13:04:54 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 07-01-2011 21:56, Oliver Endriss escreveu:
> > ...
> > There are large pieces of driver code which are currently unused, and
> > nobody can tell whether they will ever be needed.
> >
> > On the other hand a developer spent days w
Mauro,
A few comments in-line. Vide infra.
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 07-01-2011 21:42, Theodore Kilgore escreveu:
>
> >> Have you tried Mauro's media_build tree? I had to use it today to test a
> >> driver from git on a 2.6.35 kernel. Works quite nicely. Perhaps w
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 09:46:40AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 07-01-2011 21:42, Theodore Kilgore escreveu:
>
> >> Have you tried Mauro's media_build tree? I had to use it today to test a
> >> driver from git on a 2.6.35 kernel. Works quite nicely. Perhaps we
> > should
> >> promote
Em 07-01-2011 23:02, Vincent McIntyre escreveu:
> On 1/8/11, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
>> Have you tried Mauro's media_build tree? I had to use it today to test a
>> driver from git on a 2.6.35 kernel. Works quite nicely. Perhaps we should
>> promote this more. I could add backwards compatibility bui
Em 10-01-2011 10:04, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> Em 07-01-2011 21:56, Oliver Endriss escreveu:
>> On Friday 07 January 2011 22:06:30 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> On Friday, January 07, 2011 21:13:31 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Oliver Endriss wrote:
> Hi guys,
Em 07-01-2011 21:56, Oliver Endriss escreveu:
> On Friday 07 January 2011 22:06:30 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On Friday, January 07, 2011 21:13:31 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Oliver Endriss wrote:
Hi guys,
are you aware that there is a lot of '#if 0' cod
Em 07-01-2011 21:42, Theodore Kilgore escreveu:
>> Have you tried Mauro's media_build tree? I had to use it today to test a
>> driver from git on a 2.6.35 kernel. Works quite nicely. Perhaps we
> should
>> promote this more.
>
> Probably a good idea. I have been too busy to know about it, myse
Em 07-01-2011 19:06, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On Friday, January 07, 2011 21:13:31 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Oliver Endriss wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> are you aware that there is a lot of '#if 0' code in the HG repositories
>>> which is not in GIT?
>>>
>>> When d
On Jan 7, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Oliver Endriss wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> are you aware that there is a lot of '#if 0' code in the HG repositories
>> which is not in GIT?
>>
>> When drivers were submitted to the kernel from HG, the '#if 0' st
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Have you tried Mauro's media_build tree? I had to use it today to test a
> driver from git on a 2.6.35 kernel. Works quite nicely. Perhaps we should
> promote this more. I could add backwards compatibility builds to my daily
> build script that
On 1/8/11, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Have you tried Mauro's media_build tree? I had to use it today to test a
> driver from git on a 2.6.35 kernel. Works quite nicely. Perhaps we should
> promote this more. I could add backwards compatibility builds to my daily
> build script that uses this in order
On Friday 07 January 2011 22:06:30 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Friday, January 07, 2011 21:13:31 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Oliver Endriss wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > are you aware that there is a lot of '#if 0' code in the HG repositories
> > > which is not in
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Friday, January 07, 2011 21:13:31 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Oliver Endriss wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > are you aware that there is a lot of '#if 0' code in the HG repositories
> > > which is not in GIT?
> > >
On Friday, January 07, 2011 21:13:31 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Oliver Endriss wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > are you aware that there is a lot of '#if 0' code in the HG repositories
> > which is not in GIT?
> >
> > When drivers were submitted to the kernel from HG, th
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Oliver Endriss wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> are you aware that there is a lot of '#if 0' code in the HG repositories
> which is not in GIT?
>
> When drivers were submitted to the kernel from HG, the '#if 0' stuff was
> stripped, unless it was marked as 'keep'...
>
> This w
Hi guys,
are you aware that there is a lot of '#if 0' code in the HG repositories
which is not in GIT?
When drivers were submitted to the kernel from HG, the '#if 0' stuff was
stripped, unless it was marked as 'keep'...
This was fine, when development was done with HG.
As GIT is being used now,
25 matches
Mail list logo