Re: [RFCv1 PATCH 0/7] gspca: allow use of control framework and other fixes

2012-05-05 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 05/01/2012 12:28 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:13:59 +0200 Hans de Goede wrote: I'll review this and add these to my tree. Jean-Francois, is it ok for these changes to go upstream through my tree? The reason I'm asking is that I plan to convert more subdrivers

Re: [RFCv1 PATCH 0/7] gspca: allow use of control framework and other fixes

2012-05-01 Thread Jean-Francois Moine
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:13:59 +0200 Hans de Goede wrote: > I'll review this and add these to my tree. Jean-Francois, is it ok for these > changes > to go upstream through my tree? The reason I'm asking is that I plan to > convert > more subdrivers to the control framework for 3.5 and its easiest

Re: [RFCv1 PATCH 0/7] gspca: allow use of control framework and other fixes

2012-04-30 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 04/28/2012 05:09 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: Hi all, Here is a patch series that makes it possible to use the control framework in gspca. The gspca core changes are very minor but as a bonus give you priority support as well. The hard work is in updating the subdrivers. I've done two, and I

[RFCv1 PATCH 0/7] gspca: allow use of control framework and other fixes

2012-04-28 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi all, Here is a patch series that makes it possible to use the control framework in gspca. The gspca core changes are very minor but as a bonus give you priority support as well. The hard work is in updating the subdrivers. I've done two, and I intend to do the stv06xx driver as well, but that'