On 02/08/2013 11:51 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On 2013-02-04 12:05, Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
As discussed at FOSDEM I will give DSI bus with full feature set a
try.
Please do, but as a reminder I want to raise the issues I see with a DSI
bus:
- A device can be a child of only one bus. So if DSI
On 2013-02-04 12:05, Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
> As discussed at FOSDEM I will give DSI bus with full feature set a
> try.
Please do, but as a reminder I want to raise the issues I see with a DSI
bus:
- A device can be a child of only one bus. So if DSI is used only for
video, the device is a chil
On Monday 04 February 2013 03:35 PM, Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
On 02/02/2013 12:35 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Marcus,
On Tuesday 08 January 2013 18:08:19 Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
On 01/08/2013 05:36 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Tuesday 08 of January 2013 11:12:26 Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
[...]
On 02/02/2013 12:35 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Marcus,
On Tuesday 08 January 2013 18:08:19 Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
On 01/08/2013 05:36 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Tuesday 08 of January 2013 11:12:26 Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
[...]
But it is not perfect. After a couple of products we realized
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
>
> On Wednesday 09 January 2013 13:53:30 Rahul Sharma wrote:
>> Hi Laurent,
>>
>> CDF will also be helpful in supporting Panels with integrated audio
>> (HDMI/DP) if we can add audio related control operations to
>> display_entit
Hi Rahul,
On Wednesday 09 January 2013 13:53:30 Rahul Sharma wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> CDF will also be helpful in supporting Panels with integrated audio
> (HDMI/DP) if we can add audio related control operations to
> display_entity_control_ops. Video controls will be called by crtc in DRM/V4L
>
Hi Marcus,
On Tuesday 08 January 2013 11:12:26 Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
[snip]
> I also looked at the video source in Tomi's git tree
> (http://gitorious.org/linux-omap-dss2/linux/blobs/work/dss-dev-model-cdf/inc
> lude/video/display.h). I think I would prefer a single "setup" op taking a
> "stru
Hi Marcus,
On Tuesday 08 January 2013 18:08:19 Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 05:36 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 of January 2013 11:12:26 Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
[snip]
> >> FYI,
> >> here is STE "DSI API":
> >> http://www.igloocommunity.org/gitweb/?p=kernel/igloo-kernel.git
Hi Laurent,
CDF will also be helpful in supporting Panels with integrated
audio (HDMI/DP) if we can add audio related control operations to
display_entity_control_ops. Video controls will be called by crtc
in DRM/V4L and audio controls from Alsa.
Secondly, if I need to support get_modes operation
On 01/08/2013 05:36 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Tuesday 08 of January 2013 11:12:26 Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
On 01/08/2013 09:18 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thursday 27 December 2012 15:43:34 Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Monday 24 of December 2012 15:12:28 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Friday 2
On Tuesday 08 of January 2013 11:12:26 Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 09:18 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 December 2012 15:43:34 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >> > On Monday 24 of December 2012 15:12:28 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> > > On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Thursday 27 December 2012 09:54:55 Rob Clark wrote:
>> What I've done to avoid that so far is that the master device registers the
>> drivers for it's output sub-devices before registering it's own device.
>
> I'm not sure to
On 01/08/2013 09:18 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thursday 27 December 2012 15:43:34 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Monday 24 of December 2012 15:12:28 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan
Hi Daniel,
On Sunday 06 January 2013 18:46:47 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:57:25AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On the topic of discussions, would anyone be interested in a
> > > BoF/brainstorming/whatever session
On Friday 28 December 2012 01:04:04 Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 01:57:56PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:54:55AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart
> >
Hi Rob,
On Thursday 27 December 2012 09:54:55 Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 December 2012 00:21:32 Rob Clark wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> >> Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, a
Hi Tomasz,
On Thursday 27 December 2012 15:43:34 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Monday 24 of December 2012 15:12:28 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
> > > > On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laure
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:57:25AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Laurent Pinchart
> wrote:
> > On the topic of discussions, would anyone be interested in a
> > BoF/brainstorming/whatever session during the FOSDEM ?
>
> I will be at FOSDEM.. and from http://wiki.x.org
On 27 December 2012 20:13, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> On Monday 24 of December 2012 15:12:28 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Hi Tomasz,
>>
>> On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
>> > > On 17 December 2012 20:5
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 01:57:56PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:54:55AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart
> >
> > This implies that the master driver knows all potential su
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:54:55AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Rob,
>> >
>> > On Tuesday 18 December 2012 00:21:32 Rob Clark wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dav
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:04:22AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Laurent Pinchart
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 16:57:56 Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> It just seems to me that, at least from a DRM/KMS perspective, adding
> >> another layer (=CDF) for HDMI or DP
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:54:55AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart
> wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > On Tuesday 18 December 2012 00:21:32 Rob Clark wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> >> Many developers showed interest in th
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2012 09:26:40 Rob Clark wrote:
>> And, there are also external HDMI encoders (for example connected over
>> i2c) that can also be shared between boards. So I think there will be
>> a number of cases where CDF is
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2012 16:57:56 Jani Nikula wrote:
>> It just seems to me that, at least from a DRM/KMS perspective, adding
>> another layer (=CDF) for HDMI or DP (or legacy outputs) would be
>> overengineering it. They are pretty
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> On the topic of discussions, would anyone be interested in a
> BoF/brainstorming/whatever session during the FOSDEM ?
I will be at FOSDEM.. and from http://wiki.x.org/wiki/fosdem2013 it
looks like at least Daniel will be there. If enoug
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Tuesday 18 December 2012 00:21:32 Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> >> Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the
>> >> opportunity to discuss it with most o
Hi Laurent,
On Monday 24 of December 2012 15:12:28 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
> > > On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > Hi Vikas,
> > > >
>
Hi Rob,
(CC'ing Hans Verkuil)
On Wednesday 19 December 2012 10:05:27 Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > On 2012-12-19 17:26, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> And, there are also external HDMI encoders (for example connected over
> >> i2c) that can also be shared be
Hi Rob,
On Wednesday 19 December 2012 09:26:40 Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> On Monday 17 December 2012 18:53:37 Jani Nikula wrote:
> >>> I can see the need for a framework for DSI panels and such (in fa
Hi Tomi,
On Wednesday 19 December 2012 17:07:50 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 2012-12-19 16:57, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > It just seems to me that, at least from a DRM/KMS perspective, adding
> > another layer (=CDF) for HDMI or DP (or legacy outputs) would be
> > overengineering it. They are pretty wel
Hi Jani,
On Wednesday 19 December 2012 16:57:56 Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 17 December 2012 18:53:37 Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> I can see the need for a framework for DSI panels and such (in fact Tomi
> >> and I have talked about it like 2-3 years
Hi Sylwester,
On Tuesday 18 December 2012 11:59:35 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 12/18/2012 07:21 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> So this might be a bit off topic but this whole CDF triggered me
> >> looking at stuff I generally avoid:
> >>
> >
Hi Marcus,
On Tuesday 18 December 2012 11:39:11 Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
> On 12/18/2012 06:04 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the
> >> opportunity to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in
> >> no particular order) Tomi Va
Hi Tomasz,
On Friday 21 December 2012 11:00:52 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
> > On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > Hi Vikas,
> > >
> > > Sorry for the late reply. I now have more time to work on CDF, so
> > > delays should
Hi Inki,
On Tuesday 18 December 2012 18:38:31 Inki Dae wrote:
> 2012/12/18 Daniel Vetter
> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> > >> The other thing I'd like you guys to do is kill the idea of fbdev and
> > >> v4l drivers that are "shared" with the drm codebase, really just
> >
Hi Daniel,
On Tuesday 18 December 2012 09:30:00 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> The other thing I'd like you guys to do is kill the idea of fbdev and
> >> v4l drivers that are "shared" with the drm codebase, really just
> >> implement fbdev and v4l on
Hi Rob,
On Tuesday 18 December 2012 00:21:32 Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the
> >> opportunity to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in
> >> no particular order) Tomi V
Hi Dave,
On Tuesday 18 December 2012 15:04:02 Dave Airlie wrote:
> > Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the
> > opportunity to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in no
> > particular order) Tomi Valkeinen for all the time he spend helping me to
> > dra
Hi Vikas,
On Tuesday 18 December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
> On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Vikas,
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply. I now have more time to work on CDF, so delays
> > should be much shorter.
> >
> > On Thursday 06 December 2012 10:51:15 Vikas S
Hi Vikas,
On Tuesday 18 of December 2012 08:31:30 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laurent Pinchart <
>
> laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> > Hi Vikas,
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply. I now have more time to work on CDF, so
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
>
>
> 2012/12/18 Daniel Vetter
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> >> The other thing I'd like you guys to do is kill the idea of fbdev and
>> >> v4l drivers that are "shared" with the drm codebase, really just
>> >> impleme
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>>
>>> Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the
>>> opportunity
>>> to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in no particular
>>> order) Tomi Valkei
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 2012-12-19 17:26, Rob Clark wrote:
>>
>> And, there are also external HDMI encoders (for example connected over
>> i2c) that can also be shared between boards. So I think there will be
>> a number of cases where CDF is appropriate for HD
On 2012-12-19 17:26, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Jani Nikula
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Laurent -
>>
>> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Jani,
>>>
>>> On Monday 17 December 2012 18:53:37 Jani Nikula wrote:
I can see the need for a framework for DSI panel
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Jani Nikula
wrote:
>
> Hi Laurent -
>
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart
> wrote:
>> Hi Jani,
>>
>> On Monday 17 December 2012 18:53:37 Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> I can see the need for a framework for DSI panels and such (in fact Tomi
>>> and I have talked abou
On 2012-12-19 16:57, Jani Nikula wrote:
> It just seems to me that, at least from a DRM/KMS perspective, adding
> another layer (=CDF) for HDMI or DP (or legacy outputs) would be
> overengineering it. They are pretty well standardized, and I don't see
> there would be a need to write multiple disp
Hi Laurent -
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Jani,
>
> On Monday 17 December 2012 18:53:37 Jani Nikula wrote:
>> I can see the need for a framework for DSI panels and such (in fact Tomi
>> and I have talked about it like 2-3 years ago already!) but what is the
>> story for HDMI
On 12/18/2012 07:21 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
So this might be a bit off topic but this whole CDF triggered me
looking at stuff I generally avoid:
The biggest problem I'm having currently with the whole ARM graphics
and output world is the prolif
On 12/18/2012 06:04 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the opportunity
to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in no particular
order) Tomi Valkeinen for all the time he spend helping me to draft v2, Marcus
Lorentzon for his usefu
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> The other thing I'd like you guys to do is kill the idea of fbdev and
>> v4l drivers that are "shared" with the drm codebase, really just
>> implement fbdev and v4l on top of the drm layer, some people might
>> think this is some sort of maintai
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the
>> opportunity
>> to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in no particular
>> order) Tomi Valkeinen for all the time he spend helping me to draft v2,
>> M
Hi All,
On 17 December 2012 20:55, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Hi Vikas,
>
> Sorry for the late reply. I now have more time to work on CDF, so delays
> should be much shorter.
>
> On Thursday 06 December 2012 10:51:15 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
> > Hi Laurent,
> >
> > I was thinking of porting CDF to sa
>
> Many developers showed interest in the first RFC, and I've had the opportunity
> to discuss it with most of them. I would like to thank (in no particular
> order) Tomi Valkeinen for all the time he spend helping me to draft v2, Marcus
> Lorentzon for his useful input during Linaro Connect Q4 20
Hi Tomi,
On Monday 17 December 2012 17:29:15 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 2012-12-17 16:36, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 23 November 2012 16:51:37 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> >> On 2012-11-22 23:45, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> From: Laurent Pinchart
> >>>
> >>> Hi everybody,
> >>>
> >>> He
Hi Jani,
On Monday 17 December 2012 18:53:37 Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 23 November 2012 16:51:37 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> >> On 2012-11-22 23:45, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> > From: Laurent Pinchart
> >> >
> >> > Hi everybody,
> >> >
> >> >
Hi Laurent -
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tomi,
>
> I finally have time to work on a v3 :-)
>
> On Friday 23 November 2012 16:51:37 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> On 2012-11-22 23:45, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > From: Laurent Pinchart
>> >
>> > Hi everybody,
>> >
>> > Here's t
On 2012-12-17 16:36, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tomi,
>
> I finally have time to work on a v3 :-)
>
> On Friday 23 November 2012 16:51:37 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> On 2012-11-22 23:45, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> From: Laurent Pinchart
>>>
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>> Here's the second RFC of what
Hi Alan,
On Monday 26 November 2012 14:47:08 Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 09:15:51 +0200 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > On 2012-11-23 21:56, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:45:31PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >
> > >> Display entities are accessed by
Hi Sascha,
On Friday 23 November 2012 22:41:58 Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:45:31PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > From: Laurent Pinchart
> >
> > The CDF models this using a Russian doll's model. From the display
> > controller point of view only the first external entity
Hi Thierry,
On Friday 23 November 2012 20:56:07 Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:45:31PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Display entities are accessed by driver using notifiers. Any driver can
> > register a display entity notifier with the CDF, which then calls the
Hi Tomi,
I finally have time to work on a v3 :-)
On Friday 23 November 2012 16:51:37 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 2012-11-22 23:45, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > From: Laurent Pinchart
> >
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > Here's the second RFC of what was previously known as the Generic Panel
> > Framewo
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 09:15:51 +0200
Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 2012-11-23 21:56, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:45:31PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Display entities are accessed by driver using notifiers. Any driver can
> >> register a display entity notifie
Hi Thierry,
Am Freitag, den 23.11.2012, 20:56 +0100 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:45:31PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> [...]
> > Display entities are accessed by driver using notifiers. Any driver can
> > register a display entity notifier with the CDF, which then calls
On 2012-11-23 21:56, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:45:31PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> [...]
>> Display entities are accessed by driver using notifiers. Any driver can
>> register a display entity notifier with the CDF, which then calls the
>> notifier
>> when a matching
Hi Laurent,
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:45:31PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> From: Laurent Pinchart
>
> The CDF models this using a Russian doll's model. From the display controller
> point of view only the first external entity (LVDS to DSI converter) is
> visible. The display controller t
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:45:31PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
[...]
> Display entities are accessed by driver using notifiers. Any driver can
> register a display entity notifier with the CDF, which then calls the notifier
> when a matching display entity is registered. The reason for this asyn
Hi,
On 2012-11-22 23:45, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> From: Laurent Pinchart
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> Here's the second RFC of what was previously known as the Generic Panel
> Framework.
Nice work! Thanks for working on this.
I was doing some testing with the code, seeing how to use it in omapdss.
From: Laurent Pinchart
Hi everybody,
Here's the second RFC of what was previously known as the Generic Panel
Framework.
I won't repeat all the background information from the first version here, you
can read it at http://lwn.net/Articles/512363/.
Many developers showed interest in the first RF
69 matches
Mail list logo
