Hi Hans,
Am Donnerstag, den 28.08.2014, 19:41 +0200 schrieb Hans Verkuil:
> On 08/28/2014 07:32 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On 08/28/2014 07:18 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> I really don't see any gain on applying such patch. If the concern is
> >> just about properly naming the pixel form
On 08/28/2014 07:32 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 08/28/2014 07:18 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:40:53 +0200
>> Hans Verkuil escreveu:
>>
>>> On 08/28/2014 06:25 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Philipp,
On Thursday 28 August 2014 18:09:35 Philipp Zabel wro
On 08/28/2014 07:18 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:40:53 +0200
> Hans Verkuil escreveu:
>
>> On 08/28/2014 06:25 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> Hi Philipp,
>>>
>>> On Thursday 28 August 2014 18:09:35 Philipp Zabel wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 28.08.2014, 14:24 +0200
Em Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:40:53 +0200
Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On 08/28/2014 06:25 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Philipp,
> >
> > On Thursday 28 August 2014 18:09:35 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> >> Am Donnerstag, den 28.08.2014, 14:24 +0200 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> A driver could then do the
On 08/28/2014 06:25 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> On Thursday 28 August 2014 18:09:35 Philipp Zabel wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag, den 28.08.2014, 14:24 +0200 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
A driver could then do the following:
static struct v4l2_pixfmt_info driver_formats[] =
Hi Philipp,
On Thursday 28 August 2014 18:09:35 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 28.08.2014, 14:24 +0200 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> > > A driver could then do the following:
> > >
> > > static struct v4l2_pixfmt_info driver_formats[] = {
> > >
> > > { .pixelformat = V4L2_PIX_FMT_YUYV
Hi Laurent,
Am Donnerstag, den 28.08.2014, 14:24 +0200 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> > A driver could then do the following:
> >
> > static struct v4l2_pixfmt_info driver_formats[] = {
> > { .pixelformat = V4L2_PIX_FMT_YUYV },
> > { .pixelformat = V4L2_PIX_FMT_YUV420 },
> > };
> >
> > int
Hi Philipp,
On Wednesday 27 August 2014 11:30:14 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 26.08.2014, 12:01 +0200 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> [...]
>
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +const struct v4l2_pixfmt *v4l2_pixfmt_by_fourcc(u32 fourcc)
> > > +{
> > > + int i;
> >
> > The loop counter is always pos
Hi Laurent,
thank you for the comments.
Am Dienstag, den 26.08.2014, 12:01 +0200 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
[...]
> > +};
> > +
> > +const struct v4l2_pixfmt *v4l2_pixfmt_by_fourcc(u32 fourcc)
> > +{
> > + int i;
>
> The loop counter is always positive, it can be an unsigned int.
I'll change t
Hi Philipp,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 11:00:54 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> This patch adds an array of V4L2 pixel formats and descriptions that can be
> used by drivers so that each driver doesn't have to provide its own slightly
> different format descriptions for VIDIOC_ENUM
This patch adds an array of V4L2 pixel formats and descriptions that can be
used by drivers so that each driver doesn't have to provide its own slightly
different format descriptions for VIDIOC_ENUM_FMT.
Each array entry also includes two bits per pixel values (for a single line and
one for the wh
11 matches
Mail list logo
