Hi,
> From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 6:47 PM
>
> On Tue 7 May 2013 17:42:57 Kamil Debski wrote:
> > Hi Hans,
> >
> > Thanks for this patch. I remember that there was some discussion
> about
> > it and the conclusion was that a codec device is in fact
Mauro.
Regards,
Hans
>
> Best wishes,
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 2:06 PM
> > To: linux-media
> > Cc: Kamil Debski
> > Subject: [RFC PATCH for 3.10] Update Codec sec
directly with Mauro?
Best wishes,
--
Kamil Debski
Linux Platform Group
Samsung Poland R&D Center
> -Original Message-
> From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 2:06 PM
> To: linux-media
> Cc: Kamil Debski
> Subject: [RFC PATCH
I had feedback from two companies recently that they thought V4L2 didn't
support codec hardware because the Codec section in the spec said it was
'suspended'.
That's really bad so I made a quick patch for this that I'd like to get into
3.10 because of the unintended high impact this outdated docum
