On 06/09/2017 12:25 AM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> 2017-06-08 Shuah Khan :
>
>> Hi Gustavo,
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Gustavo,
>>>
>>> Em Wed, 24 May 2017 21:31:01 -0300
>>> Gustavo Padovan escreveu:
>>>
Hi all,
I've been working on
Le lundi 03 avril 2017 à 15:46 -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas a
écrit :
> > The problem is that adding implicit fences changed the behavior of
> > the ioctls, causing gstreamer to wait forever for buffers to be ready.
> >
>
> The problem was related to trying to make user-space unaware of the im
2017-06-08 Shuah Khan :
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> wrote:
> > Hi Gustavo,
> >
> > Em Wed, 24 May 2017 21:31:01 -0300
> > Gustavo Padovan escreveu:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I've been working on the v2 of this series, but I think I hit a blocker
>
Hi Mauro,
2017-06-08 Mauro Carvalho Chehab :
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> Em Wed, 24 May 2017 21:31:01 -0300
> Gustavo Padovan escreveu:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've been working on the v2 of this series, but I think I hit a blocker
> > when trying to cover the case where the driver asks to requeue the
>
Hi Gustavo,
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> Em Wed, 24 May 2017 21:31:01 -0300
> Gustavo Padovan escreveu:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been working on the v2 of this series, but I think I hit a blocker
>> when trying to cover the case where the driver a
Hi Gustavo,
Em Wed, 24 May 2017 21:31:01 -0300
Gustavo Padovan escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been working on the v2 of this series, but I think I hit a blocker
> when trying to cover the case where the driver asks to requeue the
> buffer. It is related to the out-fence side.
>
> In the current
Hi all,
I've been working on the v2 of this series, but I think I hit a blocker
when trying to cover the case where the driver asks to requeue the
buffer. It is related to the out-fence side.
In the current implementation we return on QBUF an out-fence fd that is not
tied to any buffer, because w
Hello Gustavo,
On 04/06/2017 10:08 AM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
> 2017-04-05 Javier Martinez Canillas :
>
>> Hello Gustavo,
>>
>> On 04/05/2017 11:09 AM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
>>> 2017-04-03 Javier Martinez Canillas :
>>>
Hello Mauro and Gustavo,
On 04/03/2017 07:16
Hi Javier,
2017-04-05 Javier Martinez Canillas :
> Hello Gustavo,
>
> On 04/05/2017 11:09 AM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > 2017-04-03 Javier Martinez Canillas :
> >
> >> Hello Mauro and Gustavo,
> >>
> >> On 04/03/2017 07:16 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >>> Hi Gustavo,
> >>>
> >>> Em Mon, 1
Hi Gustavo,
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 05:24:57PM +0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> 2017-04-04 Sakari Ailus :
>
> > Hi Gustavo,
> >
> > Thank you for the patchset. Please see my comments below.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 04:20:25PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > > From: Gusta
Hello Gustavo,
On 04/05/2017 11:09 AM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> 2017-04-03 Javier Martinez Canillas :
>
>> Hello Mauro and Gustavo,
>>
>> On 04/03/2017 07:16 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Hi Gustavo,
>>>
>>> Em Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:20:25 -0300
>>> Gustavo Padovan escreveu:
>>>
From: G
Hi Sakari,
2017-04-04 Sakari Ailus :
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> Thank you for the patchset. Please see my comments below.
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 04:20:25PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > From: Gustavo Padovan
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This RFC adds support for Explicit Synchronization of shared buf
2017-04-03 Javier Martinez Canillas :
> Hello Mauro and Gustavo,
>
> On 04/03/2017 07:16 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Hi Gustavo,
> >
> > Em Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:20:25 -0300
> > Gustavo Padovan escreveu:
> >
> >> From: Gustavo Padovan
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This RFC adds support for E
Hi Gustavo,
Thank you for the patchset. Please see my comments below.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 04:20:25PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> From: Gustavo Padovan
>
> Hi,
>
> This RFC adds support for Explicit Synchronization of shared buffers in V4L2.
> It uses the Sync File Framework[1] as vecto
Hi Gustavo,
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> Hello Mauro and Gustavo,
>
> On 04/03/2017 07:16 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Hi Gustavo,
>>
>> Em Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:20:25 -0300
>> Gustavo Padovan escreveu:
>>
>>> From: Gustavo Padovan
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> T
Hello Mauro and Gustavo,
On 04/03/2017 07:16 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> Em Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:20:25 -0300
> Gustavo Padovan escreveu:
>
>> From: Gustavo Padovan
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This RFC adds support for Explicit Synchronization of shared buffers in V4L2.
>> It uses the
Hi Gustavo,
Em Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:20:25 -0300
Gustavo Padovan escreveu:
> From: Gustavo Padovan
>
> Hi,
>
> This RFC adds support for Explicit Synchronization of shared buffers in V4L2.
> It uses the Sync File Framework[1] as vector to communicate the fences
> between kernel and userspace.
From: Gustavo Padovan
Hi,
This RFC adds support for Explicit Synchronization of shared buffers in V4L2.
It uses the Sync File Framework[1] as vector to communicate the fences
between kernel and userspace.
I'm sending this to start the discussion on the best approach to implement
Explicit Synchr
18 matches
Mail list logo
