Hi Sylwester,
My apologies for the delayed answer.
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 07:56:23PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 06/03/2013 03:25 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:41:50PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> >>[...]
> >I'm in favour of using a separate video buff
Hi Sakari,
On 06/03/2013 03:25 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:41:50PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
[...]
I'm in favour of using a separate video buffer queue for passing
low-level
metadata to user space.
Sure. I certainly see a need for such an interface. I wouldn't l
Hi Sylwester,
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:41:50PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> [...]
> >>>I'm in favour of using a separate video buffer queue for passing
> >>>low-level
> >>>metadata to user space.
> >>
> >>Sure. I certainly see a need for such an interface. I wouldn't like to
> >>see it
> >
Hi Sakari,
On 05/21/2013 07:30 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
Hi Sylwester,
My apologies for the late answer.
No problem at all, thank you for your follow up.
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 05/08/2013 06:26 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 04:04:10PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Hi Sylwester,
My apologies for the late answer.
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Hi Sakari :-)
On 05/08/2013 06:26 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 04:04:10PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 05/07/2013 02:35 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
A metadata plane works well if you have substan
Hi Sakari :-)
On 05/08/2013 06:26 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 04:04:10PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 05/07/2013 02:35 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
A metadata plane works well if you have substantial amounts of data (e.g.
histogram
data) but it has the disadvantage of re
Hi Sylwester,
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 04:04:10PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 05/07/2013 02:35 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > A metadata plane works well if you have substantial amounts of data (e.g.
> > histogram
> > data) but it has the disadvantage of requiring you to use the MPLANE buff
Hi Laurent, Hans and others,
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 02:09:54PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> (CC'ing Sakari, I know he's missing reviewing V4L2 patches ;-))
Thanks for cc'ing me! :-) I know I've been very quite recently, but it's not
going to stay like that permanently. Let's say I've been ve
On 05/07/2013 02:35 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> A metadata plane works well if you have substantial amounts of data (e.g.
> histogram
> data) but it has the disadvantage of requiring you to use the MPLANE buffer
> types,
> something which standard apps do not support. I definitely think that is
>
On Tue 7 May 2013 14:09:54 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> (CC'ing Sakari, I know he's missing reviewing V4L2 patches ;-))
>
> On Monday 06 May 2013 15:41:41 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Mon April 29 2013 22:52:31 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Friday 12 April 2013 17:36:16 Hans Verkuil wr
Hi Hans,
(CC'ing Sakari, I know he's missing reviewing V4L2 patches ;-))
On Monday 06 May 2013 15:41:41 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Mon April 29 2013 22:52:31 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 12 April 2013 17:36:16 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > This RFC looks at adding support for motion detection
On Mon April 29 2013 22:52:31 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> On Friday 12 April 2013 17:36:16 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > This RFC looks at adding support for motion detection to V4L2. This is the
> > main missing piece that prevents the go7007 and solo6x10 drive
Hi Hans,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Friday 12 April 2013 17:36:16 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> This RFC looks at adding support for motion detection to V4L2. This is the
> main missing piece that prevents the go7007 and solo6x10 drivers from being
> moved into mainline from the staging directory.
>
>
On Sun April 21 2013 14:04:26 Ismael Luceno wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:36:16 +0200
> Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > This RFC looks at adding support for motion detection to V4L2. This
> > is the main missing piece that prevents the go7007 and solo6x10
> > drivers from being moved into mainline from
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:36:16 +0200
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> This RFC looks at adding support for motion detection to V4L2. This
> is the main missing piece that prevents the go7007 and solo6x10
> drivers from being moved into mainline from the staging directory.
<...>
> Comment? Questions?
+1. I lik
This RFC looks at adding support for motion detection to V4L2. This is the main
missing piece that prevents the go7007 and solo6x10 drivers from being moved
into mainline from the staging directory.
Step one is to look at existing drivers/hardware:
1) The go7007 driver:
- divides the fra
16 matches
Mail list logo
