On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:48:28 +0100
Luca Risolia wrote:
> > Note that et61x251 and sn9c102 are going to be deprecated and removed at
> > some
> > time in the future (gspca will support these devices).
>
> Has this been discussed yet? Also, last time I tried the gspca driver
> with a number of
Hans Verkuil ha scritto:
On Saturday 12 November 2011 20:46:25 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Hi all,
This RFC is discussing the current support of JPEG encoders in V4L2 and
a proposal of new JPEG control class.
Motivation
==
JPEG encoder control is also required at the sub-device level
On 11/28/2011 01:20 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Saturday 12 November 2011 20:46:25 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This RFC is discussing the current support of JPEG encoders in V4L2 and
>> a proposal of new JPEG control class.
...
>>
>> et61x251, sn9c102, s2255drv.c
>>
On Saturday 12 November 2011 20:46:25 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This RFC is discussing the current support of JPEG encoders in V4L2 and
> a proposal of new JPEG control class.
>
>
> Motivation
> ==
>
> JPEG encoder control is also required at the sub-device level, but
> cu
Hi Sakari,
On 11/26/2011 07:43 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Sylwester,
>
> Thanks for the RFC. I originally missed it; thanks for pointing to it!
Thanks for your comments!
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 08:46:25PM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This RFC is discussing the curren
Hi Sylwester,
Thanks for the RFC. I originally missed it; thanks for pointing to it!
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 08:46:25PM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This RFC is discussing the current support of JPEG encoders in V4L2 and
> a proposal of new JPEG control class.
>
>
> Motivati
Hi all,
This RFC is discussing the current support of JPEG encoders in V4L2 and
a proposal of new JPEG control class.
Motivation
==
JPEG encoder control is also required at the sub-device level, but currently
there are only defined ioctls in regular V4L2 device API. It doesn't seem
to
