Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/1] Ignore ctrl_class

2011-09-06 Thread Sakari Ailus
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 02:55:39PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 13:45:48 Sakari Ailus wrote: > > Hi Hans, > > > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 01:20:26PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 13:07:42 Sakari Ailus wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > >

Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/1] Ignore ctrl_class

2011-09-06 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 13:45:48 Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 01:20:26PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 13:07:42 Sakari Ailus wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I remember being in a discussion a while ago regarding the requirement of

Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/1] Ignore ctrl_class

2011-09-06 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi Hans, On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 01:20:26PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 13:07:42 Sakari Ailus wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I remember being in a discussion a while ago regarding the requirement of > > having all the controls belonging to the same class in > > VIDIOC_{TRY

Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/1] Ignore ctrl_class

2011-09-06 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 13:07:42 Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi, > > I remember being in a discussion a while ago regarding the requirement of > having all the controls belonging to the same class in > VIDIOC_{TRY,S,G}_EXT_CTRLS. The answer I remember was that there was a > historical reason for

[RFC/PATCH 0/1] Ignore ctrl_class

2011-09-06 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi, I remember being in a discussion a while ago regarding the requirement of having all the controls belonging to the same class in VIDIOC_{TRY,S,G}_EXT_CTRLS. The answer I remember was that there was a historical reason for this and it no longer exists. So here's the patch. The changes in driv