On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 02:55:39PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 13:45:48 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Hans,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 01:20:26PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 13:07:42 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> >
On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 13:45:48 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 01:20:26PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 13:07:42 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I remember being in a discussion a while ago regarding the requirement of
Hi Hans,
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 01:20:26PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 13:07:42 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I remember being in a discussion a while ago regarding the requirement of
> > having all the controls belonging to the same class in
> > VIDIOC_{TRY
On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 13:07:42 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I remember being in a discussion a while ago regarding the requirement of
> having all the controls belonging to the same class in
> VIDIOC_{TRY,S,G}_EXT_CTRLS. The answer I remember was that there was a
> historical reason for
Hi,
I remember being in a discussion a while ago regarding the requirement of
having all the controls belonging to the same class in
VIDIOC_{TRY,S,G}_EXT_CTRLS. The answer I remember was that there was a
historical reason for this and it no longer exists.
So here's the patch.
The changes in driv