On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I've got a situation, for which I currently don't have a (good) solution.
>
> Ok, right, would it be acceptable to just do something like
>
> if (dev->par
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:27:36AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I've got a situation, for which I currently don't have a (good) solution.
> >
> > Let's say device A depends on device B and as long as B hasn't probed, A
> > r
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:27:36AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've got a situation, for which I currently don't have a (good) solution.
>
> Let's say device A depends on device B and as long as B hasn't probed, A
> requests deferred probing. Now B probes, which causes A to also
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've got a situation, for which I currently don't have a (good) solution.
Ok, right, would it be acceptable to just do something like
if (dev->parent)
device_lock(dev->parent);
dev
Hi
I've got a situation, for which I currently don't have a (good) solution.
Let's say device A depends on device B and as long as B hasn't probed, A
requests deferred probing. Now B probes, which causes A to also succeed
its probing. Next we want to remove B, say, by unloading its driver. A ha
