Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] support of v4l2 encoder for STMicroelectronics SOC

2016-09-05 Thread Jean Christophe TROTIN
On 09/05/2016 04:40 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > I ran checkpatch and it complains (correctly) that the MAINTAINERS file > wasn't updated. > Can you add an entry for this driver to the MAINTAINERS file and post it as a > separate > patch? I promise, that's the last thing I need :-) > > Regards, >

Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] support of v4l2 encoder for STMicroelectronics SOC

2016-09-05 Thread Hans Verkuil
I ran checkpatch and it complains (correctly) that the MAINTAINERS file wasn't updated. Can you add an entry for this driver to the MAINTAINERS file and post it as a separate patch? I promise, that's the last thing I need :-) Regards, Hans On 09/05/2016 04:06 PM, Jean-Christophe Trotin

[PATCH v6 0/3] support of v4l2 encoder for STMicroelectronics SOC

2016-09-05 Thread Jean-Christophe Trotin
version 6: - "depends on HAS_DMA" added in Kconfig - g/s parm only supported for output - V4L2_CAP_TIMEPERFRAME capability set in g/s parm - V4L2 compliance successfully passed with this version (see report below) version 5: - Compilation problem with 4.8-rc1 corrected: unsigned long used for dma_