Hi Stephen,
On 24/09/13 20:49, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> >> Should those property names be prefixed with "st,"; I assume they're
>>> >> specific to this binding rather than something generic that applies to
>>> >> all IR controller bindings? If you expect them to be generic, it's fine.
>> >
>> >
On 09/24/2013 02:08 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
> Thanks Stephen,
> On 23/09/13 21:40, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 09/19/2013 02:59 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
>>> This patch adds support to ST RC driver, which is basically a IR/UHF
>>> receiver and transmitter. This IP (IRB) is common across
Thanks Stephen,
On 23/09/13 21:40, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/19/2013 02:59 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
>> This patch adds support to ST RC driver, which is basically a IR/UHF
>> receiver and transmitter. This IP (IRB) is common across all the ST
>> parts for settop box platforms. IRB is embe
On 09/19/2013 02:59 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
> This patch adds support to ST RC driver, which is basically a IR/UHF
> receiver and transmitter. This IP (IRB) is common across all the ST
> parts for settop box platforms. IRB is embedded in ST COMMS IP block.
> It supports both Rx & Tx function
From: Srinivas Kandagatla
This patch adds support to ST RC driver, which is basically a IR/UHF
receiver and transmitter. This IP (IRB) is common across all the ST
parts for settop box platforms. IRB is embedded in ST COMMS IP block.
It supports both Rx & Tx functionality.
In this driver adds onl