On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 03:33:39AM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> Since there were no actual problems reported before, I suppose the old
> code, which was passing to remap_pfn_range() a physical page number
> calculated from dma_alloc_coherent() privided dma_handle, worked
> correctly on all
On Wendesday, 23 March 2011, at 11:00:06, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
> You might want to retest ams-delta with the camera on the current
> (next or git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git staging/for_v2.6.39) kernel
> ...
Hi Guennadi,
With the patch I've just submitted to the linux-media list
(http
On Wednesday, 23 March 2011, at 11:00:06, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Janusz
>
> You might want to retest ams-delta with the camera on the current
> (next or
>
> git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git staging/for_v2.6.39
>
> ) kernel - I suspect, you'll need something similar to
>
> http://arti
Hi Janusz
You might want to retest ams-delta with the camera on the current (next or
git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git staging/for_v2.6.39
) kernel - I suspect, you'll need something similar to
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/30728
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Gue
Sunday 03 October 2010 04:42:53 Guennadi Liakhovetski napisał(a):
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > Saturday 02 October 2010 08:07:28 Guennadi Liakhovetski napisał(a):
> > > Same with this one - let's take it as is and address a couple of
> > > clean-ups later.
> >
> > Guennadi,
>
On Sat, 2 Oct 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> Saturday 02 October 2010 08:07:28 Guennadi Liakhovetski napisał(a):
> > Same with this one - let's take it as is and address a couple of clean-ups
> > later.
>
> Guennadi,
> Thanks for taking them both.
>
> BTW, what are your intentions about the l
Saturday 02 October 2010 08:07:28 Guennadi Liakhovetski napisał(a):
> Same with this one - let's take it as is and address a couple of clean-ups
> later.
Guennadi,
Thanks for taking them both.
BTW, what are your intentions about the last patch from my series still left
not commented, "SoC Camera
Same with this one - let's take it as is and address a couple of clean-ups
later.
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> +static void omap1_videobuf_queue(struct videobuf_queue *vq,
> + struct videobuf_buffer *vb)
> +{
> + struct soc_came
This is a V4L2 driver for TI OMAP1 SoC camera interface.
Both videobuf-dma versions are supported, contig and sg, selectable with a
module option. The former uses less processing power, but often fails to
allocate contignuous buffer memory. The latter is free of this problem, but
generates tens
