On Wednesday, December 14, 2011 14:34:14 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On 12/13/2011 01:18 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> are you going to carry on with the control range update patches ?
> >> I'd like to push the alpha colour control for v3.3 but it depends
> >> on the controls framework
Hi Hans,
On 12/13/2011 01:18 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> are you going to carry on with the control range update patches ?
>> I'd like to push the alpha colour control for v3.3 but it depends
>> on the controls framework updates now.
>
> Good question. I am not sure whether this is something we ac
On Thursday 08 December 2011 10:30:58 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 11/29/2011 07:58 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 November 2011 19:30:25 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, November 29, 2011 19:10:39 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 29 November 2011 17:40:10 Sylwester Naw
Hi Laurent,
On 12/08/2011 11:30 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Another use case for control range update would be with an auto-exposure
>> metering spot location controls. An available range for x and y coordinates
>> would depend on selected pixel resolution. If we would have created two
>> contr
Hi Sylwester,
On Thursday 08 December 2011 10:30:58 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 11/29/2011 07:58 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 November 2011 19:30:25 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, November 29, 2011 19:10:39 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 29 November 2011 17:40:1
On 11/29/2011 07:58 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 November 2011 19:30:25 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On Tuesday, November 29, 2011 19:10:39 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 29 November 2011 17:40:10 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 11/29/2011 12:08 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On M
Hi Sylwester,
On Tuesday 29 November 2011 20:39:39 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 11/29/2011 07:10 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 November 2011 17:40:10 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> >> On 11/29/2011 12:08 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>> On Monday 28 November 2011 14:02:49 Sylwester Naw
Hi Laurent!
On 11/29/2011 07:10 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Sylwester,
>
> On Tuesday 29 November 2011 17:40:10 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> On 11/29/2011 12:08 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> On Monday 28 November 2011 14:02:49 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 11/28/2011 01:39 PM, Hans Verkuil
Hi Hans,
On Tuesday 29 November 2011 19:30:25 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 29, 2011 19:10:39 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 November 2011 17:40:10 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > > On 11/29/2011 12:08 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > > On Monday 28 November 2011 14:02:49 Sylwes
On Tuesday, November 29, 2011 19:10:39 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Sylwester,
>
> On Tuesday 29 November 2011 17:40:10 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > On 11/29/2011 12:08 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > On Monday 28 November 2011 14:02:49 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > >> On 11/28/2011 01:39 PM, Hans
Hi Sylwester,
On Tuesday 29 November 2011 17:40:10 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 11/29/2011 12:08 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Monday 28 November 2011 14:02:49 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> >> On 11/28/2011 01:39 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>> On Monday 28 November 2011 13:13:32 Sylwester Nawrocki
Hi Hans,
On 11/29/2011 12:08 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Monday 28 November 2011 14:02:49 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> On 11/28/2011 01:39 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> On Monday 28 November 2011 13:13:32 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 11/28/2011 12:38 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Friday 25
On Monday 28 November 2011 14:02:49 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 01:39 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Monday 28 November 2011 13:13:32 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> >> On 11/28/2011 12:38 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>> On Friday 25 November 2011 16:39:31 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> T
On 11/28/2011 01:39 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Monday 28 November 2011 13:13:32 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> On 11/28/2011 12:38 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> On Friday 25 November 2011 16:39:31 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
This control is intended for the video capture or memory-to-memory
d
On Monday 28 November 2011 13:13:32 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 12:38 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Friday 25 November 2011 16:39:31 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> >> This control is intended for the video capture or memory-to-memory
> >> devices that are capable of setting up a per-pix
On 11/28/2011 12:38 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Friday 25 November 2011 16:39:31 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> This control is intended for the video capture or memory-to-memory devices
>> that are capable of setting up a per-pixel alpha component to some
>> arbitrary value. The V4L2_CID_ALPHA_COMP
On Friday 25 November 2011 16:39:31 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> This control is intended for the video capture or memory-to-memory devices
> that are capable of setting up a per-pixel alpha component to some
> arbitrary value. The V4L2_CID_ALPHA_COMPONENT control allows to set the
> alpha component
Hi Sylwester,
On Friday 25 November 2011 16:39:31 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> This control is intended for the video capture or memory-to-memory devices
> that are capable of setting up a per-pixel alpha component to some
> arbitrary value. The V4L2_CID_ALPHA_COMPONENT control allows to set the
>
This control is intended for the video capture or memory-to-memory devices
that are capable of setting up a per-pixel alpha component to some arbitrary
value. The V4L2_CID_ALPHA_COMPONENT control allows to set the alpha component
for all pixels to a value in range from 0 to 255.
Signed-off-by: Syl
19 matches
Mail list logo
