On 11/12/15 10:01, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> From: Tommi Franttila
>
> When a V4L2 sub-device backed by a DT or ACPI based device was removed,
> the device was unregistered as well which certainly was not intentional,
> as the client device would not be re-created by simply reinstating the
> V4L2 sub
From: Tommi Franttila
When a V4L2 sub-device backed by a DT or ACPI based device was removed,
the device was unregistered as well which certainly was not intentional,
as the client device would not be re-created by simply reinstating the
V4L2 sub-device (indeed the device would have to be there f
