Hi Sylwester,
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 06:44:52PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> On 10/09/2017 04:18 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Sure, how about this at the end of the current commit message:
> >
> > If there is a need to support removing the clock provider in the future,
> > t
Hi Sylwester,
On Monday, 9 October 2017 19:44:52 EEST Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 10/09/2017 04:18 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Sure, how about this at the end of the current commit message:
> >
> > If there is a need to support removing the clock provider in the future,
> > this should be impl
Hi Sakari,
On 10/09/2017 04:18 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Sure, how about this at the end of the current commit message:
>
> If there is a need to support removing the clock provider in the future,
> this should be implemented in the clock framework instead, not in V4L2.
I find it a little bit mi
Em Mon, 9 Oct 2017 16:20:08 +0200
Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On 09/10/17 16:18, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Hans,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:08:47PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> On 09/10/17 16:06, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >>> Hi Mauro,
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 08:22:39AM -030
On 09/10/17 16:18, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:08:47PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 09/10/17 16:06, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>>> Hi Mauro,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 08:22:39AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Thu, 5 Oct 2017 00:50:20 +0300
Sa
Hi Hans,
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:08:47PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 09/10/17 16:06, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Mauro,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 08:22:39AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> Em Thu, 5 Oct 2017 00:50:20 +0300
> >> Sakari Ailus escreveu:
> >>
> >>> Remove V4L2
On 09/10/17 16:06, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 08:22:39AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em Thu, 5 Oct 2017 00:50:20 +0300
>> Sakari Ailus escreveu:
>>
>>> Remove V4L2 async re-probing support. The re-probing support has been
>>> there to support cases whe
Hi Mauro,
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 08:22:39AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Thu, 5 Oct 2017 00:50:20 +0300
> Sakari Ailus escreveu:
>
> > Remove V4L2 async re-probing support. The re-probing support has been
> > there to support cases where the sub-devices require resources provided b
Em Thu, 5 Oct 2017 00:50:20 +0300
Sakari Ailus escreveu:
> Remove V4L2 async re-probing support. The re-probing support has been
> there to support cases where the sub-devices require resources provided by
> the main driver's hardware to function, such as clocks.
>
> Reprobing has allowed unbin
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 12:50:20AM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Remove V4L2 async re-probing support. The re-probing support has been
> there to support cases where the sub-devices require resources provided by
> the main driver's hardware to function, such as clocks.
>
> Reprobing has allowe
Remove V4L2 async re-probing support. The re-probing support has been
there to support cases where the sub-devices require resources provided by
the main driver's hardware to function, such as clocks.
Reprobing has allowed unbinding and again binding the main driver without
explicilty unbinding th
11 matches
Mail list logo
