Em Wed, 30 Jan 2019 11:56:58 -0300
Ezequiel Garcia escreveu:
> Hey Mauro,
>
> On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 11:19 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Wed, 30 Jan 2019 09:41:44 -0300
> > Ezequiel Garcia escreveu:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2019-01-29 at 14:00 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > >
Hey Mauro,
On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 11:19 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Wed, 30 Jan 2019 09:41:44 -0300
> Ezequiel Garcia escreveu:
>
> > On Tue, 2019-01-29 at 14:00 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > It doesn't make sense to have a per-device work queue, as the
> > > scheduler sh
Em Wed, 30 Jan 2019 09:41:44 -0300
Ezequiel Garcia escreveu:
> On Tue, 2019-01-29 at 14:00 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > It doesn't make sense to have a per-device work queue, as the
> > scheduler should be called per file handler. Having a single
> > one causes failures if multiple str
On Tue, 2019-01-29 at 14:00 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> It doesn't make sense to have a per-device work queue, as the
> scheduler should be called per file handler. Having a single
> one causes failures if multiple streams are filtered by vim2m.
>
Having a per-device workqueue should em
It doesn't make sense to have a per-device work queue, as the
scheduler should be called per file handler. Having a single
one causes failures if multiple streams are filtered by vim2m.
So, move it to be inside the context structure.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
---
drivers/media/platfo
