On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
...
> From my side, as I said before, I'd like to see a documentation of the
> defined API bits,
> and the removal of the currently unused ioctls (they can be added later,
> together
> with the patches that will introduce the code that
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 03:45:38PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:44 PM, David Härdeman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 03:38:35PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> Em 04-06-2010 12:51, Christoph Bartelmus escreveu:
> >> > Hi Mauro,
> >> >
> >> > on 04 Jun 10 at 01
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:44 PM, David Härdeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 03:38:35PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em 04-06-2010 12:51, Christoph Bartelmus escreveu:
>> > Hi Mauro,
>> >
>> > on 04 Jun 10 at 01:10, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> >> Em 03-06-2010 19:06, Jarod Wilson
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 03:38:35PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 04-06-2010 12:51, Christoph Bartelmus escreveu:
> > Hi Mauro,
> >
> > on 04 Jun 10 at 01:10, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> Em 03-06-2010 19:06, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
> > [...]
> >>> As for the compat bits... I actuall
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 14:57 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>> wrote:
>> > Em 04-06-2010 12:51, Christoph Bartelmus escreveu:
>> >> Hi Mauro,
>> >>
>> >> on 04 Jun 10 at 01:10, Mauro Carvalho Cheh
Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> Hrm, struct file_operations specifies an unsigned long for the ioctl
>> args, so doesn't that mean we're pretty much stuck with only 32-bit
>> for the ioctls?
>
> I haven't written an IOCTL in a while, but how would you pas
On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 14:57 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> wrote:
> > Em 04-06-2010 12:51, Christoph Bartelmus escreveu:
> >> Hi Mauro,
> >>
> >> on 04 Jun 10 at 01:10, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >>> Em 03-06-2010 19:06, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
On Jun 4, 2010, at 10:45 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Jarod Wilson
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Jarod Wilson
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:57:04PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
...
From what I'm seeing
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:57:04PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> ...
> From what I'm seeing, those are the current used ioctls:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:57:04PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> ...
>>> > From what I'm seeing, those are the current used ioctls:
>>> >
>>> > +#define LIRC_GET_FEATURES _IOR('i'
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:57:04PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
...
>> > From what I'm seeing, those are the current used ioctls:
>> >
>> > +#define LIRC_GET_FEATURES _IOR('i', 0x, unsigned
>> > long)
>> > +#define LIRC_GET_LEN
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:57:04PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> wrote:
> > Em 04-06-2010 12:51, Christoph Bartelmus escreveu:
> >> Hi Mauro,
> >>
> >> on 04 Jun 10 at 01:10, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >>> Em 03-06-2010 19:06, Jarod Wilson es
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Em 04-06-2010 12:51, Christoph Bartelmus escreveu:
>> Hi Mauro,
>>
>> on 04 Jun 10 at 01:10, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Em 03-06-2010 19:06, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
>> [...]
As for the compat bits... I actually pulled them ou
Em 04-06-2010 12:51, Christoph Bartelmus escreveu:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> on 04 Jun 10 at 01:10, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em 03-06-2010 19:06, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
> [...]
>>> As for the compat bits... I actually pulled them out of the Fedora kernel
>>> and userspace for a while, and there were
Hi Mauro,
on 04 Jun 10 at 01:10, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 03-06-2010 19:06, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
[...]
>> As for the compat bits... I actually pulled them out of the Fedora kernel
>> and userspace for a while, and there were only a few people who really ran
>> into issues with it, but I
Em 03-06-2010 19:06, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 03:02:11AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em 01-06-2010 17:51, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
>>> Add the core lirc device interface (http://lirc.org/).
>>>
>>> This is a 99.9% unaltered lirc_dev device interface (only change bei
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 03:02:11AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 01-06-2010 17:51, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
> > Add the core lirc device interface (http://lirc.org/).
> >
> > This is a 99.9% unaltered lirc_dev device interface (only change being
> > the path to lirc.h), which has been car
Em 01-06-2010 17:51, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
> Add the core lirc device interface (http://lirc.org/).
>
> This is a 99.9% unaltered lirc_dev device interface (only change being
> the path to lirc.h), which has been carried in the Fedora kernels and
> has been built for numerous other distro kernels
Add the core lirc device interface (http://lirc.org/).
This is a 99.9% unaltered lirc_dev device interface (only change being
the path to lirc.h), which has been carried in the Fedora kernels and
has been built for numerous other distro kernels for years. In the
next two patches in this series, ir
19 matches
Mail list logo
