Em 24-06-2011 09:20, Devin Heitmueller escreveu:
> Also, it screws up the ability for users to get fixes through the
> media_build tree (unless you are increasing the revision constantly
> with every merge you do).
Patches merged, and media_build modified in order to use the V4L2 stack
version, i
Em 24-06-2011 19:39, Stefan Richter escreveu:
> On Jun 24 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Stefan Richter
>> wrote:
>>> Easier:
>>> "I run Ubuntu 10.4".
>>> "I run kernel 2.6.32."
>>> One of these is usually already included in the first post or IRC message
>>> from t
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 19:16 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 24-06-2011 18:04, Andy Walls escreveu:
> > On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 14:48 -0400, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Stefan Richter
> >> wrote:
> >>> If the "driver version" is in fact an ABI version, then
On Jun 24 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Stefan Richter
> wrote:
> > Easier:
> > "I run Ubuntu 10.4".
> > "I run kernel 2.6.32."
> > One of these is usually already included in the first post or IRC message
> > from the user.
> >
> > Separate driver versions are only
Em 24-06-2011 18:04, Andy Walls escreveu:
> On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 14:48 -0400, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Stefan Richter
>> wrote:
>>> If the "driver version" is in fact an ABI version, then the driver author
>>> should really increase it only when ABI behavior is
Em 24-06-2011 18:10, Stefan Richter escreveu:
> On Jun 24 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
>> Really, this is all about applications being able to jam a hack into
>> their code that translates to "don't call this ioctl() with some
>> particular argument if it's driver W less than version X, because the
>>
Em 24-06-2011 18:22, Devin Heitmueller escreveu:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Stefan Richter
> wrote:
>> Easier:
>> "I run Ubuntu 10.4".
>> "I run kernel 2.6.32."
>> One of these is usually already included in the first post or IRC message
>> from the user.
>>
>> Separate driver versions a
Em 24-06-2011 15:34, Stefan Richter escreveu:
> On Jun 24 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em 24-06-2011 10:54, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
>>> On Friday, June 24, 2011 15:45:59 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
The versions are increased at the discretion of the driver maintainer,
usually when there is
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Stefan Richter
wrote:
> Easier:
> "I run Ubuntu 10.4".
> "I run kernel 2.6.32."
> One of these is usually already included in the first post or IRC message
> from the user.
>
> Separate driver versions are only needed on platforms where drivers are
> not distribu
On Jun 24 Andy Walls wrote:
> I also use the driver version for troubleshooting problem with users. I
> roughly know what wasn't working in what version of the cx18 and ivtv
> drivers. If the end user can tell me the driver version (using v4l2-ctl
> --log-status) along with his symptoms, it makes
On Jun 24 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> Really, this is all about applications being able to jam a hack into
> their code that translates to "don't call this ioctl() with some
> particular argument if it's driver W less than version X, because the
> driver had a bug that is likely to panic the guy's P
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 14:48 -0400, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Stefan Richter
> wrote:
> > If the "driver version" is in fact an ABI version, then the driver author
> > should really increase it only when ABI behavior is changed (and only if
> > the behavior change
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Stefan Richter
wrote:
> If the "driver version" is in fact an ABI version, then the driver author
> should really increase it only when ABI behavior is changed (and only if
> the behavior change can only be communicated by version number --- e.g.
> addition of an i
On Jun 24 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 24-06-2011 10:54, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> > On Friday, June 24, 2011 15:45:59 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> >> The versions are increased at the discretion of the driver maintainer,
> >> usually when there is some userland visible change in driver behavior.
Em 24-06-2011 10:54, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On Friday, June 24, 2011 15:45:59 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>> wrote:
MythTV has a bunch of these too (mainly so the code can adapt to
driver bugs that are fixed in later revisions). P
On Friday, June 24, 2011 15:45:59 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> wrote:
> >> MythTV has a bunch of these too (mainly so the code can adapt to
> >> driver bugs that are fixed in later revisions). Putting Mauro's patch
> >> upstream will definite
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
>> MythTV has a bunch of these too (mainly so the code can adapt to
>> driver bugs that are fixed in later revisions). Putting Mauro's patch
>> upstream will definitely cause breakage.
>
> It shouldn't, as ivtv driver version is lower
Em 24-06-2011 09:20, Devin Heitmueller escreveu:
>> Applications are certainly using it. I know this for a fact for the ivtv
>> driver where
>> feature improvements are marked that way.
>>
>> Without more research on how this is used I am not comfortable with this.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>Hans
> Applications are certainly using it. I know this for a fact for the ivtv
> driver where
> feature improvements are marked that way.
>
> Without more research on how this is used I am not comfortable with this.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
MythTV has a bunch of these too (mainly so the code can
On Friday, June 24, 2011 13:21:14 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 23-06-2011 18:58, Jesper Juhl escreveu:
> > It was pointed out by 'make versioncheck' that some includes of
> > linux/version.h were not needed in include/.
> > This patch removes them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
> > ---
Em 23-06-2011 18:58, Jesper Juhl escreveu:
> It was pointed out by 'make versioncheck' that some includes of
> linux/version.h were not needed in include/.
> This patch removes them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
> ---
> include/linux/ceph/messenger.h |1 -
> include/media/pwc-ioctl.h
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> It was pointed out by 'make versioncheck' that some includes of
> linux/version.h were not needed in include/.
> This patch removes them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
Acked-by: Sage Weil
for the ceph bit.
sage
> ---
> include/linux/ceph/messenger
It was pointed out by 'make versioncheck' that some includes of
linux/version.h were not needed in include/.
This patch removes them.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
---
include/linux/ceph/messenger.h |1 -
include/media/pwc-ioctl.h |1 -
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
23 matches
Mail list logo
