Em Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:53:53 +0100
Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On 10/29/14 14:17, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Mauro,
> >
> > On Wednesday 29 October 2014 11:05:34 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> Em Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:46:55 +0200 Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> > Hmm, so you think VIDEO_MAX_F
On 10/29/14 14:17, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> On Wednesday 29 October 2014 11:05:34 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:46:55 +0200 Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> Hmm, so you think VIDEO_MAX_FRAME should just be updated to 64?
Yes.
> I am a bit
Hi Mauro,
On Wednesday 29 October 2014 11:05:34 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:46:55 +0200 Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> > > > Hmm, so you think VIDEO_MAX_FRAME should just be updated to 64?
> > >
> > > Yes.
> > >
> > > > I am a bit afraid that that might break applications
Em Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:46:55 +0200
Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> > > Hmm, so you think VIDEO_MAX_FRAME should just be updated to 64?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > > I am a bit afraid that that might break applications (especially if there
> > > are any that use bits in a 32-bit unsigned variable).
> >
>
Hi Mauro,
On Wednesday 29 October 2014 10:40:33 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:01:24 +0100 Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> > On 10/29/14 10:13, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > Em Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:59:56 +0100 Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> > >> On 10/29/14 09:29, Mauro Carvalho Cheh
Em Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:01:24 +0100
Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On 10/29/14 10:13, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:59:56 +0100
> > Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> >
> >> On 10/29/14 09:29, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >>> Em Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:29:08 +0100
> >>> Hans Verkuil esc
On 10/29/14 10:13, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:59:56 +0100
> Hans Verkuil escreveu:
>
>> On 10/29/14 09:29, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Em Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:29:08 +0100
>>> Hans Verkuil escreveu:
>>>
On 10/28/2014 07:26 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
Em Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:59:56 +0100
Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On 10/29/14 09:29, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:29:08 +0100
> > Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> >
> >> On 10/28/2014 07:26 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >>> Em Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:04:58 +0200
> >>> Hans Verkuil
On 10/29/14 09:29, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:29:08 +0100
> Hans Verkuil escreveu:
>
>> On 10/28/2014 07:26 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Em Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:04:58 +0200
>>> Hans Verkuil escreveu:
>>>
(This patch is from Divneil except for the vivid chan
Em Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:29:08 +0100
Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On 10/28/2014 07:26 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:04:58 +0200
> > Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> >
> >> (This patch is from Divneil except for the vivid changes which I added. He
> >> had
> >> difficulties post
On 10/28/2014 07:26 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:04:58 +0200
> Hans Verkuil escreveu:
>
>> (This patch is from Divneil except for the vivid changes which I added. He
>> had
>> difficulties posting the patch without the mailer mangling it, so I'm
>> reposting
>> it f
Em Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:04:58 +0200
Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> (This patch is from Divneil except for the vivid changes which I added. He had
> difficulties posting the patch without the mailer mangling it, so I'm
> reposting
> it for him)
>
> - vb2 drivers to rely on VB2_MAX_FRAME.
>
> - VB2_MAX
Hi Laurent,
On 10/11/2014 07:21 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Friday 10 October 2014 10:04:58 Hans Verkuil wrote:
(This patch is from Divneil except for the vivid changes which I added. He
had difficulties posting the patch without the mailer mangling it, so I'm
reposting it for him)
Hi Hans,
On Friday 10 October 2014 10:04:58 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> (This patch is from Divneil except for the vivid changes which I added. He
> had difficulties posting the patch without the mailer mangling it, so I'm
> reposting it for him)
>
> - vb2 drivers to rely on VB2_MAX_FRAME.
>
> - VB2_M
(This patch is from Divneil except for the vivid changes which I added. He had
difficulties posting the patch without the mailer mangling it, so I'm reposting
it for him)
- vb2 drivers to rely on VB2_MAX_FRAME.
- VB2_MAX_FRAME bumps the value to 64 from current 32
Signed-off-by: Divneil Wadhawa
15 matches
Mail list logo