On 05/09/2016 05:44 PM, Helen Koike wrote:
> In case of failure, print "q.create_bufs(node, 1, &fmt) != EINVAL" instead
> of "ret != EINVAL"
>
> Signed-off-by: Helen Koike
> ---
>
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering, why the q.create_bufs is expected to should return EINVAL in
> this test? The height
In case of failure, print "q.create_bufs(node, 1, &fmt) != EINVAL" instead
of "ret != EINVAL"
Signed-off-by: Helen Koike
---
Hello,
I was wondering, why the q.create_bufs is expected to should return EINVAL in
this test? The height and size are set to half of the original values, and the
type
