Re: [PATCH] s2255drv: Don't conditionalize video buffer completion on waiting processes

2009-09-23 Thread Mike Isely
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, dean wrote: > This seems ok. This portion of code was based on vivi.c, so that might be > checked also. Yes, after seeing the mention of vivi in this driver I looked at vivi.c and saw the same construct there. Though I'm willing to bet that it's just as incorrect there as

Re: [PATCH] s2255drv: Don't conditionalize video buffer completion on waiting processes

2009-09-23 Thread dean
This seems ok. This portion of code was based on vivi.c, so that might be checked also. Mike Isely wrote: # HG changeset patch # User Mike Isely # Date 1253739604 18000 # Node ID 522a74147753ba59c7f45e368439928090a286f2 # Parent e349075171ddf939381fad432c23c1269abc4899 s2255drv: Don't cond

[PATCH] s2255drv: Don't conditionalize video buffer completion on waiting processes

2009-09-23 Thread Mike Isely
# HG changeset patch # User Mike Isely # Date 1253739604 18000 # Node ID 522a74147753ba59c7f45e368439928090a286f2 # Parent e349075171ddf939381fad432c23c1269abc4899 s2255drv: Don't conditionalize video buffer completion on waiting processes From: Mike Isely The s2255 driver had logic which abor