Hi Antti
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari :
> On 07/23/2011 02:01 AM, HoP wrote:
>>
>> 2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari:
>>>
>>> On 07/23/2011 01:47 AM, HoP wrote:
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari:
>
> On 07/23/2011 01:18 AM, HoP wrote:
>>
>> In case of i2c write operation there is only one e
2011/7/23 Malcolm Priestley :
> On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 01:47 +0200, HoP wrote:
>> 2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari :
>> > On 07/23/2011 02:31 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 07/23/2011 02:01 AM, HoP wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> 2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari:
>>
>> But now I see what you mean. msg2[
On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 01:47 +0200, HoP wrote:
> 2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari :
> > On 07/23/2011 02:31 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> >>
> >> On 07/23/2011 02:01 AM, HoP wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari:
>
> But now I see what you mean. msg2[1] is set as garbage fields in case of
>
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari :
> On 07/23/2011 02:31 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
>>
>> On 07/23/2011 02:01 AM, HoP wrote:
>>>
>>> 2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari:
But now I see what you mean. msg2[1] is set as garbage fields in case of
incoming msg len is 1. True, but it does not harm since it
On 07/23/2011 02:31 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
On 07/23/2011 02:01 AM, HoP wrote:
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari:
But now I see what you mean. msg2[1] is set as garbage fields in case of
incoming msg len is 1. True, but it does not harm since it is not
used in
that case.
In case of write, cxd2820r
On 07/23/2011 02:01 AM, HoP wrote:
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari:
On 07/23/2011 01:47 AM, HoP wrote:
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari:
On 07/23/2011 01:18 AM, HoP wrote:
In case of i2c write operation there is only one element in msg[] array.
Don't access msg[1] in that case.
NACK.
I suspect you co
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari :
> On 07/23/2011 01:47 AM, HoP wrote:
>>
>> 2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari:
>>>
>>> On 07/23/2011 01:18 AM, HoP wrote:
In case of i2c write operation there is only one element in msg[] array.
Don't access msg[1] in that case.
>>>
>>> NACK.
>>> I suspect you conf
On 07/23/2011 01:47 AM, HoP wrote:
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari:
On 07/23/2011 01:18 AM, HoP wrote:
In case of i2c write operation there is only one element in msg[] array.
Don't access msg[1] in that case.
NACK.
I suspect you confuse now local msg2 and msg that is passed as function
parameter.
2011/7/23 Antti Palosaari :
> On 07/23/2011 01:18 AM, HoP wrote:
>>
>> In case of i2c write operation there is only one element in msg[] array.
>> Don't access msg[1] in that case.
>
> NACK.
> I suspect you confuse now local msg2 and msg that is passed as function
> parameter. Could you double chec
On 07/23/2011 01:18 AM, HoP wrote:
In case of i2c write operation there is only one element in msg[] array.
Don't access msg[1] in that case.
NACK.
I suspect you confuse now local msg2 and msg that is passed as function
parameter. Could you double check and explain?
regards
Antti
Signed-
In case of i2c write operation there is only one element in msg[] array.
Don't access msg[1] in that case.
Signed-off-by: Honza Petrous
--
diff -uBbp cxd2820r_core.c.orig cxd2820r_core.c
--- cxd2820r_core.c.orig2011-07-22 23:31:56.319168405 +0200
+++ cxd2820r_core.c 2011-07-22 23:35
11 matches
Mail list logo