On Lunes, 8 de Agosto de 2011 23:44:43 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> Reviewed-by: Antti Palosaari
>
> It looks just fine.
>
> regards
> Antti
>
Forgot the Signed-off-by
Signed-off-by: Jose Alberto Reguero
Jose Alberto
> On 08/08/2011 01:35 PM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
> > On Martes, 2 de
Reviewed-by: Antti Palosaari
It looks just fine.
regards
Antti
On 08/08/2011 01:35 PM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
> On Martes, 2 de Agosto de 2011 21:21:13 Jose Alberto Reguero escribió:
>> On Jueves, 28 de Julio de 2011 21:25:01 Jose Alberto Reguero escribió:
>>> On Miércoles, 27 de Julio de
On Martes, 2 de Agosto de 2011 21:21:13 Jose Alberto Reguero escribió:
> On Jueves, 28 de Julio de 2011 21:25:01 Jose Alberto Reguero escribió:
> > On Miércoles, 27 de Julio de 2011 21:22:26 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> > > On 07/24/2011 12:45 AM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
> > > > Read without wri
On Jueves, 28 de Julio de 2011 21:25:01 Jose Alberto Reguero escribió:
> On Miércoles, 27 de Julio de 2011 21:22:26 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> > On 07/24/2011 12:45 AM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
> > > Read without write work as with write. Attached updated patch.
> > >
> > > ttusb2-6.diff
> > >
On Miércoles, 27 de Julio de 2011 21:22:26 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> On 07/24/2011 12:45 AM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
> > Read without write work as with write. Attached updated patch.
> >
> > ttusb2-6.diff
> >
> > - read = i+1< num&& (msg[i+1].flags& I2C_M_RD);
> > +
On 07/24/2011 12:45 AM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
Read without write work as with write. Attached updated patch.
ttusb2-6.diff
- read = i+1< num&& (msg[i+1].flags& I2C_M_RD);
+ write_read = i+1< num&& (msg[i+1].flags& I2C_M_RD);
+ read = ms
On Sábado, 23 de Julio de 2011 19:47:27 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> On 07/23/2011 06:41 PM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
> > On Sábado, 23 de Julio de 2011 12:37:53 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> >> On 07/23/2011 01:21 PM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
> >>> On Sábado, 23 de Julio de 2011 11:42:58 Antti
On 07/23/2011 06:41 PM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
On Sábado, 23 de Julio de 2011 12:37:53 Antti Palosaari escribió:
On 07/23/2011 01:21 PM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
On Sábado, 23 de Julio de 2011 11:42:58 Antti Palosaari escribió:
On 07/23/2011 11:26 AM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
The p
On Sábado, 23 de Julio de 2011 12:37:53 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> On 07/23/2011 01:21 PM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
> > On Sábado, 23 de Julio de 2011 11:42:58 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> >> On 07/23/2011 11:26 AM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
> >>> The problem is in i2c read in tda827x_probe_ve
On 07/23/2011 01:21 PM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
On Sábado, 23 de Julio de 2011 11:42:58 Antti Palosaari escribió:
On 07/23/2011 11:26 AM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
The problem is in i2c read in tda827x_probe_version. Without the fix
sometimes, when changing the code the tuner is detecte
On Sábado, 23 de Julio de 2011 11:42:58 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> On 07/23/2011 11:26 AM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
> > On Sábado, 23 de Julio de 2011 00:23:05 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> >> On 07/23/2011 12:49 AM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
> >>> On Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2011 20:12:20 Jose
On 07/23/2011 11:26 AM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
On Sábado, 23 de Julio de 2011 00:23:05 Antti Palosaari escribió:
On 07/23/2011 12:49 AM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
On Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2011 20:12:20 Jose Alberto Reguero escribió:
On Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2011 18:46:24 Antti Palos
On Sábado, 23 de Julio de 2011 00:23:05 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> On 07/23/2011 12:49 AM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
> > On Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2011 20:12:20 Jose Alberto Reguero escribió:
> >> On Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2011 18:46:24 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> >>> On 07/22/2011 07:25 PM, J
On 07/23/2011 12:49 AM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
On Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2011 20:12:20 Jose Alberto Reguero escribió:
On Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2011 18:46:24 Antti Palosaari escribió:
On 07/22/2011 07:25 PM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
On Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2011 18:08:39 Antti Palo
On Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2011 20:12:20 Jose Alberto Reguero escribió:
> On Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2011 18:46:24 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> > On 07/22/2011 07:25 PM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
> > > On Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2011 18:08:39 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> > >> On 07/22/2011 07:02 PM
On 07/22/2011 07:25 PM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
On Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2011 18:08:39 Antti Palosaari escribió:
On 07/22/2011 07:02 PM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
On Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2011 13:32:53 Antti Palosaari escribió:
Have you had to time test these?
And about I2C adapter,
On Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2011 18:08:39 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> On 07/22/2011 07:02 PM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
> > On Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2011 13:32:53 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> >> Have you had to time test these?
> >>
> >> And about I2C adapter, I don't see why changes are needed.
On 07/22/2011 07:02 PM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
On Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2011 13:32:53 Antti Palosaari escribió:
Have you had to time test these?
And about I2C adapter, I don't see why changes are needed. As far as I
understand it is already working with TDA10023 and you have done changes
On Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2011 13:32:53 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> Have you had to time test these?
>
> And about I2C adapter, I don't see why changes are needed. As far as I
> understand it is already working with TDA10023 and you have done changes
> for TDA10048 support. I compared TDA10048 an
Have you had to time test these?
And about I2C adapter, I don't see why changes are needed. As far as I
understand it is already working with TDA10023 and you have done changes
for TDA10048 support. I compared TDA10048 and TDA10023 I2C functions and
those are ~similar. Both uses most typical a
On 07/19/2011 11:25 AM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
On Martes, 19 de Julio de 2011 01:44:54 Antti Palosaari escribió:
On 07/19/2011 02:00 AM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
On Lunes, 18 de Julio de 2011 22:28:41 Antti Palosaari escribió:
There are two problems:
First, the two frontends (tda100
On Martes, 19 de Julio de 2011 01:44:54 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> On 07/19/2011 02:00 AM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
> > On Lunes, 18 de Julio de 2011 22:28:41 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> >> Hello
> >> I did some review for this since I was interested of adding MFE for
> >> Anysee driver which i
On 07/19/2011 02:00 AM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
On Lunes, 18 de Julio de 2011 22:28:41 Antti Palosaari escribió:
Hello
I did some review for this since I was interested of adding MFE for
Anysee driver which is rather similar (dvb-usb-framework).
I found this patch have rather major issue(s)
On Lunes, 18 de Julio de 2011 22:28:41 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> Hello
> I did some review for this since I was interested of adding MFE for
> Anysee driver which is rather similar (dvb-usb-framework).
>
> I found this patch have rather major issue(s) which should be fixed
> properly.
>
> * it
MFE really needs to be implemented in the dvb-usb framework itself. I
had started to work on this some time ago but had to stop working on
it due to lack of time, and the fact that there was no public driver
that I could use as a poster-child for the new functionality. In the
end, rather than impl
Hello
I did some review for this since I was interested of adding MFE for
Anysee driver which is rather similar (dvb-usb-framework).
I found this patch have rather major issue(s) which should be fixed
properly.
* it does not compile
drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/dvb-usb.h:24:21: fatal error: dvb
On Miércoles, 13 de Julio de 2011 14:41:30 Mauro Carvalho Chehab escribió:
> Em 06-07-2011 19:57, Jose Alberto Reguero escreveu:
> > This patch add suport for the dvb-t part of CT-3650.
> >
> > Jose Alberto
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jose Alberto Reguero
> >
> > patches/lmml_951522_add_support_for_
27 matches
Mail list logo
