Hi!
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Are you sure you cannot make some time for this?
Sorry, probably not. At least not in the near future.
Mitar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.o
Hi,
On 10/27/2010 03:59 PM, Mitar wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
If and only if libjpeg-turbo turns out to be much slower this is something
to consider. But the first thing to do here is see if we can solve this
in a way which is acceptable to all downstream
Hi!
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Janne Grunau wrote:
> While the patch is not the cleanest, there shouldn't be a problem of
> making ffmpeg mjpeg decoding optional.
In which way not the cleanest? I am always searching for ways to
improve my further work. So please elaborate.
Mitar
--
To u
Hi!
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> If and only if libjpeg-turbo turns out to be much slower this is something
> to consider. But the first thing to do here is see if we can solve this
> in a way which is acceptable to all downstream users of libv4l, and thus
> can be adde
Hi,
On 10/27/2010 12:49 PM, Janne Grunau wrote:
With using ffmpeg MJPEG decoding it takes my computer on average
43.616 ms to decode the frame what is 0.0087 us per pixel.
That is a great improvement, but using ffmpeg in libv4l is not an option
for multiple reasons:
1) It is GPL licensed n
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:08:35AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/27/2010 01:51 AM, Mitar wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Mitar wrote:
> >> Has anybody tried to improve MJPEG support in libv4l? With newer
> >> cameras this becomes important.
> >
> > I have mad
Hi,
On 10/27/2010 01:51 AM, Mitar wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Mitar wrote:
Has anybody tried to improve MJPEG support in libv4l? With newer
cameras this becomes important.
I have made a patch which makes libv4l uses ffmpeg's avcodec library
for MJPEG decoding. Performance im
Hi!
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Mitar wrote:
> Has anybody tried to improve MJPEG support in libv4l? With newer
> cameras this becomes important.
I have made a patch which makes libv4l uses ffmpeg's avcodec library
for MJPEG decoding. Performance improvements are unbelievable.
I have been
