On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 03:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
Luiz Ramos wrote:
> Now my doubts. Unless I misunderstood something, it seems these are
> the our assumptions regarding reg01 and reg17:
>
> - reg01 bit 6 is set when bridge runs at 48 MHz; if reset, 24 MHz
> - reg17 bits 0..4 is a mask for dividing a
Francois Moine
> Assunto: Re: [PATCH] Fix wrong register mask in gspca/sonixj.c
> Para: "Luiz Ramos"
> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> Data: Quarta-feira, 20 de Julho de 2011, 8:12
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:39:14 -0700
> (PDT)
> Luiz Ramos
> wrote:
> [snip]
&
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
Luiz Ramos wrote:
[snip]
> I noticed that in 640x480 the device worked fine, but in 320x240 and
> 160x120 it didn't (I mean: the image is dark). Or'ing reg17 with 0x04
> in line 2535 (as it's currently done for VGA) is sufficient to make
> the webca
these bits. But I can't see how this relates to exposure.
For my purposes, I'll stay with that change; it's sufficient for my purposes.
If you know what I did, please advise me. :-)
Thanks for your help,
Luiz
--- Em sex, 15/7/11, Jean-Francois Moine escreveu:
> De: Jean
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 02:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
Luiz Ramos wrote:
> Ok, I'm now grabbing this tarball:
> http://moinejf.free.fr/gspca-2.13.2.tar.gz.
>
> The site also features a (some) git repository(ies) but I understood
> you mean the test version, is it right?
Yes. The tarball is simpler to compile
--- Em sex, 15/7/11, Jean-Francois Moine escreveu:
> De: Jean-Francois Moine
> Assunto: Re: [PATCH] Fix wrong register mask in gspca/sonixj.c
> Para: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> Data: Sexta-feira, 15 de Julho de 2011, 4:48
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:08:39 -0700
> (PDT)
>
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
Luiz Ramos wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Luiz Carlos Ramos yahoo.com.br>
>
>
> --- a/drivers/media/video/gspca/sonixj.c2011-07-14
> 13:14:41.0 -0300 +++
> b/drivers/media/video/gspca/sonixj.c2011-07-14
> 13:22:26.0 -0300 @@ -23
Hello,
That's the first time I submit a patch to the Linux kernel. I hope I could do
it right; please forgive me in case of mistakes.
The context: when migrating from Slackware 13.1 to 13.37 (kernel 2.6.33.x to
2.6.37.6), there was some sort of regression with the external webcam installed
at
