On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:25:10PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 04-05-2011 17:36, Greg KH escreveu:
> > Yes, as long as .39 is working properly. We take patches in -stable for
> > stuff like this at times, it just needs to be specified exactly like you
> > did above.
>
> OK.
>
> > Wa
Em 04-05-2011 17:36, Greg KH escreveu:
> Yes, as long as .39 is working properly. We take patches in -stable for
> stuff like this at times, it just needs to be specified exactly like you
> did above.
OK.
> Want me to take this patch as-is for .38-stable?
Yes, please. I'm forwarding you bellow
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:16:29PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Lawerence,
>
> Em 03-05-2011 14:19, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
> > On May 3, 2011, at 3:25 AM, Lawrence Rust wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 15:50 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >>> Em 08-04-2011 09:50, Lawrence
Hi Lawerence,
Em 03-05-2011 14:19, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
> On May 3, 2011, at 3:25 AM, Lawrence Rust wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 15:50 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Em 08-04-2011 09:50, Lawrence Rust escreveu:
This patch restores remote control input for cx2388x based boards
On May 3, 2011, at 3:25 AM, Lawrence Rust wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 15:50 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em 08-04-2011 09:50, Lawrence Rust escreveu:
>>> This patch restores remote control input for cx2388x based boards on
>>> Linux kernels >= 2.6.38.
>>>
>>> After upgrading from Lin
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 15:50 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 08-04-2011 09:50, Lawrence Rust escreveu:
> > This patch restores remote control input for cx2388x based boards on
> > Linux kernels >= 2.6.38.
> >
> > After upgrading from Linux 2.6.37 to 2.6.38 I found that the remote
> > contr
Em 08-04-2011 09:50, Lawrence Rust escreveu:
> This patch restores remote control input for cx2388x based boards on
> Linux kernels >= 2.6.38.
>
> After upgrading from Linux 2.6.37 to 2.6.38 I found that the remote
> control input of my Hauppauge Nova-S plus was no longer functioning.
> I posted
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 21:39 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > Jarod,
> >
> > The HVR-1850 uses a raw IR receiver in the CX23888 and older
> HVR-1250s use the raw IR receiver in the CX23885. They both work for
> Rx (I need to tweak the Cx23885 rx watermark though), but I never
> found time to finish
On Apr 8, 2011, at 4:50 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
> Jarod Wilson wrote:
...
I have quite a few pieces of Hauppauge hardware, several with IR
receivers and remotes, but all of which use ir-kbd-i2c (or
lirc_zilog), i.e., none of which pass along raw IR.
>>>
>>> You don't have an HVR-950
Jarod Wilson wrote:
>On Apr 8, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
>...
>> I question the notion of introducing the requirement that all keymap
>> definitions must have system codes without having really thought
>> through the notion that it would result in breaking every existing
>> keyma
On Apr 8, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
...
> I question the notion of introducing the requirement that all keymap
> definitions must have system codes without having really thought
> through the notion that it would result in breaking every existing
> keymap which hadn't been updated.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Have to admit that I don't think it ever registered in my head that
> we were going to break that many existing keymaps. But something
> to consider: how many of those are *raw* rc-5 scancode keymaps, vs.
> cooked scancodes from drivers that on
On Apr 8, 2011, at 12:50 PM, Lawrence Rust wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 12:21 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Lawrence Rust wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 10:41 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Apr 8, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Lawrence Rust wrote:
> This patc
On Apr 8, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> The problem is that there isn't a "the keytable". There are many
>> many keytables. And a lot of different hardware. Testing all possible
>> combinations of hardware (both receiver side
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> The problem is that there isn't a "the keytable". There are many
> many keytables. And a lot of different hardware. Testing all possible
> combinations of hardware (both receiver side and remote side) is
> next to impossible. We do what we can
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 12:21 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Lawrence Rust wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 10:41 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >> On Apr 8, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Lawrence Rust wrote:
> >>
> >>> This patch restores remote control input for cx2388x based board
On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Lawrence Rust wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 10:41 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> On Apr 8, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Lawrence Rust wrote:
>>
>>> This patch restores remote control input for cx2388x based boards on
>>> Linux kernels >= 2.6.38.
>>>
>>> After upgrading from Lin
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 10:41 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Lawrence Rust wrote:
>
> > This patch restores remote control input for cx2388x based boards on
> > Linux kernels >= 2.6.38.
> >
> > After upgrading from Linux 2.6.37 to 2.6.38 I found that the remote
> > control
On Apr 8, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Lawrence Rust wrote:
> This patch restores remote control input for cx2388x based boards on
> Linux kernels >= 2.6.38.
>
> After upgrading from Linux 2.6.37 to 2.6.38 I found that the remote
> control input of my Hauppauge Nova-S plus was no longer functioning.
> I p
On Apr 8, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Lawrence Rust wrote:
> This patch restores remote control input for cx2388x based boards on
> Linux kernels >= 2.6.38.
>
> After upgrading from Linux 2.6.37 to 2.6.38 I found that the remote
> control input of my Hauppauge Nova-S plus was no longer functioning.
> I p
This patch restores remote control input for cx2388x based boards on
Linux kernels >= 2.6.38.
After upgrading from Linux 2.6.37 to 2.6.38 I found that the remote
control input of my Hauppauge Nova-S plus was no longer functioning.
I posted a question on this newsgroup and Mauro Carvalho Chehab g
21 matches
Mail list logo
