On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 10:22 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Friday, September 10, 2010 09:38:44 Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On 2010-09-10 13:27, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >
> > >>> 1) it lacks implementation of read() method. This means that vivi driver
> > >>> has a regressio
Em 10-09-2010 04:38, Marek Szyprowski escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> On 2010-09-10 13:27, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
1) it lacks implementation of read() method. This means that vivi driver
has a regression, as it currently supports it.
>>>
>>> Yes, read() is not yet implemented. I guess it
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> It's been a long standing wish to convert the ivtv and cx18 drivers to
> videobuf,
> but it's always been too complex. With a new vb2 implementation it may become
> actually possible.
FYI: KernelLabs has done a port of cx18 to videobuf. We
On Friday, September 10, 2010 09:38:44 Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2010-09-10 13:27, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> >>> 1) it lacks implementation of read() method. This means that vivi driver
> >>> has a regression, as it currently supports it.
> >>
> >> Yes, read() is not yet impl
Hello,
On 2010-09-10 13:27, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
1) it lacks implementation of read() method. This means that vivi driver
has a regression, as it currently supports it.
Yes, read() is not yet implemented. I guess it is not a feature that would
be deprecated, right?
Yes, there are no
Em 10-09-2010 00:20, Pawel Osciak escreveu:
> Hello Mauro,
>
> On 09/10/2010 02:53 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em 09-09-2010 06:19, Pawel Osciak escreveu:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > These patches add a new driver framework for Video for Linux 2 driver
>> > - Videobuf2.
>>
>> I didn't test the p
Hello Mauro,
On 09/10/2010 02:53 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 09-09-2010 06:19, Pawel Osciak escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> These patches add a new driver framework for Video for Linux 2 driver
> - Videobuf2.
I didn't test the patches, but, from a source code review, they seem
on a good shape. I
Em 09-09-2010 06:19, Pawel Osciak escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> These patches add a new driver framework for Video for Linux 2 driver
> - Videobuf2.
I didn't test the patches, but, from a source code review, they seem
on a good shape. I did a few comments on some patches. There are a few
missing feature
On 09/09/2010 06:19 PM, Pawel Osciak wrote:
Hello,
These patches add a new driver framework for Video for Linux 2 driver
- Videobuf2.
Sorry, I failed to mention that these patches depend on the multi-planar
API extensions, but do not require multi-planar support in drivers and
in vivi.
Vide
Hello,
These patches add a new driver framework for Video for Linux 2 driver
- Videobuf2.
Videobuf2 is intended as a replacement for videobuf, the current driver
framework, which will be referred to as "videobuf1" for the remainder
of this document.
What is video
10 matches
Mail list logo
