On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:35:28 +, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > I'm not sure if maybe I misunderstood or missed a mail, but I haven't
> > seen a proposal to resolve the situation without rewinds. Given that
> > Mauro already
On 18/03/14 01:30, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> I agree with you. I know that DT bindings review takes too much time, slows
> development down and is just generally painful. I'm trying to reply to this e-
> mail thread as fast as possible, but I'm also busy with other tasks :-/
>
> The lack of form
Hi Philipp,
On Friday 14 March 2014 13:19:39 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 13.03.2014, 18:13 +0100 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> > On Thursday 13 March 2014 12:08:16 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > > Am Montag, den 10.03.2014, 14:37 + schrieb Grant Likely:
> > > > > > Nak. I made comments t
Hi Robert,
On Friday 14 March 2014 08:05:05 Robert Schwebel wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 04:13:08PM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > My experience and feelings are similar, I started to treat mainline
> > kernel much less seriously after similar DT related blocking issues.
>
> So how do w
Hi Philipp, Grant,
On 14/03/14 14:19, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>>> People completely disagree about the direction the phandle links should
>>> point in. I am still of the opinion that the generic binding should describe
>>> just the topology, that the endpoint links in the kernel should represent an
Hi Laurent,
Am Donnerstag, den 13.03.2014, 18:13 +0100 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> On Thursday 13 March 2014 12:08:16 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 10.03.2014, 14:37 + schrieb Grant Likely:
> > > > > Nak. I made comments that haven't been resolved yet. I've replied w
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 04:13:08PM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> My experience and feelings are similar, I started to treat mainline
> kernel much less seriously after similar DT related blocking issues.
So how do we proceed now? Philipp implemented any of the suggested
variants now; nev
Hi Philipp,
On Thursday 13 March 2014 12:08:16 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Montag, den 10.03.2014, 14:37 + schrieb Grant Likely:
> > > > Nak. I made comments that haven't been resolved yet. I've replied with
> > > > more detail tonight. The big issues are how drivers handle the
> > > > optional
On 13/03/14 16:13, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 13/03/14 12:35, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> [...]
>> > Grant and myself have exchanged emails in private on this discussing what
>> > should happen - essentially Grant's position is that he's happy to leave
>> > this stuff queued provided a re
On 13/03/14 12:35, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
[...]
> Grant and myself have exchanged emails in private on this discussing what
> should happen - essentially Grant's position is that he's happy to leave
> this stuff queued provided a resolution to his concerns are forthcoming.
>
> However, wh
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> I'm not sure if maybe I misunderstood or missed a mail, but I haven't
> seen a proposal to resolve the situation without rewinds. Given that
> Mauro already reverted the media tree and applied conflicting changes,
> that's probably no
Hi,
Am Montag, den 10.03.2014, 14:37 + schrieb Grant Likely:
> > > Nak. I made comments that haven't been resolved yet. I've replied with
> > > more detail tonight. The big issues are how drivers handle the optional
> > > 'ports' node and I do not agree to the double-linkage in the binding
> >
Em Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:37:58 +
Grant Likely escreveu:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:26:30 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> wrote:
> > Em Fri, 07 Mar 2014 18:23:30 +
> > Grant Likely escreveu:
> >
> > > On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 18:13:20 +0100, Philipp Zabel
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi Mauro, Russell
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:26:30 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Em Fri, 07 Mar 2014 18:23:30 +
> Grant Likely escreveu:
>
> > On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 18:13:20 +0100, Philipp Zabel
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Mauro, Russell,
> > >
> > > I have temporarily removed the simplified bindings at Sylwest
Em Fri, 07 Mar 2014 18:23:30 +
Grant Likely escreveu:
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 18:13:20 +0100, Philipp Zabel
> wrote:
> > Hi Mauro, Russell,
> >
> > I have temporarily removed the simplified bindings at Sylwester's
> > request and updated the branch with the acks. The following changes
> > si
On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 18:13:20 +0100, Philipp Zabel
wrote:
> Hi Mauro, Russell,
>
> I have temporarily removed the simplified bindings at Sylwester's
> request and updated the branch with the acks. The following changes
> since commit 0414855fdc4a40da05221fc6062cccbc0c30f169:
>
> Linux 3.14-rc5
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 09:20:31AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:55:17 +
> Russell King - ARM Linux escreveu:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 06:13:20PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > > Hi Mauro, Russell,
> > >
> > > I have temporarily removed the simplified bin
Em Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:55:17 +
Russell King - ARM Linux escreveu:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 06:13:20PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Hi Mauro, Russell,
> >
> > I have temporarily removed the simplified bindings at Sylwester's
> > request and updated the branch with the acks. The following
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 06:13:20PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Mauro, Russell,
>
> I have temporarily removed the simplified bindings at Sylwester's
> request and updated the branch with the acks. The following changes
> since commit 0414855fdc4a40da05221fc6062cccbc0c30f169:
>
> Linux 3.14
Hi Mauro, Russell,
I have temporarily removed the simplified bindings at Sylwester's
request and updated the branch with the acks. The following changes
since commit 0414855fdc4a40da05221fc6062cccbc0c30f169:
Linux 3.14-rc5 (2014-03-02 18:56:16 -0800)
are available in the git repository at:
20 matches
Mail list logo