Hello Guennadi,
Am Mittwoch, den 13.07.2011, 09:14 +0200 schrieb Guennadi Liakhovetski:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, LBM wrote:
>
> > my dear Guennadi
> > I'm wrong about that "v4l2-int-device",maybe it just "V4L2".
> >Now i have a board of OMAP3530 and a cmos camera MT9M111,so i want
>
Am Mittwoch, den 18.05.2011, 13:12 +0200 schrieb Guennadi Liakhovetski:
> Hi Teresa
>
> I've verified the mt9v022 patch - finally I have noticed the difference,
> it does look correct! As for this one, how about this version of your
> patch:
Great! Thank you.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/vi
Hello Guennadi,
Am Mittwoch, den 04.05.2011, 10:17 +0200 schrieb Guennadi Liakhovetski:
> Hi Teresa
>
> I'm adding Mauro to CC, because we were discussing adding these (this one
> and mt9m111) patches to .39.
>
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Teresa Gámez wrote:
>
> > The setup of the pixel clock is do
atm, so, maybe I'll just believe you to get them on time for
> 2.6.39.
Thank you for testing this, too.
Teresa
>
> Thanks
> Guennadi
>
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Teresa Gamez wrote:
>
> > Am Freitag, den 08.04.2011, 15:27 +0200 schrieb Teresa Gamez:
>
Am Freitag, den 08.04.2011, 15:27 +0200 schrieb Teresa Gamez:
> Hello Guennadi,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 07.04.2011, 14:41 +0200 schrieb Guennadi
> Liakhovetski:
> > Hello Teresa
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Teresa Gamez wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Guenna
Hello Guennadi,
Am Donnerstag, den 07.04.2011, 14:41 +0200 schrieb Guennadi
Liakhovetski:
> Hello Teresa
>
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Teresa Gamez wrote:
>
> > Hello Guennadi,
> >
> > the datasheet also says (see table 3):
> >
> >
> > Pixel
Hello Guennadi,
Sorry for the first mail...
The datasheet also says (see table 3):
Pixel clock out. DOUT is valid on rising edge of this
clock.
There is a difference between DOUT beeing vaild and DOUT beeing set up.
So does SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_RISING mean that the data is valid at rising
edge o
