On 08/10/12 16:05, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, Ryan Mallon wrote:
>
>> On 08/10/12 02:38, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>> From: Julia Lawall
>>>
>>> Introduce use of I2c_MSG_READ/WRITE/OP, for readability.
>>>
>>> A length expresse
On 08/10/12 12:56, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Sun, 07 Oct 2012 14:51:58 -0700
> Joe Perches escreveu:
>
>> On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 23:43 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>> On Sun, 7 Oct 2012, Joe Perches wrote:
> Are READ and WRITE the action names? They are really the important
> infor
On 08/10/12 02:38, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall
>
> Introduce use of I2c_MSG_READ/WRITE/OP, for readability.
>
> A length expressed as an explicit constant is also re-expressed as the size
> of the buffer, when this is possible.
>
> The second case is simplified to use simple variab
On 08/10/12 02:38, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall
>
> Introduce use of I2c_MSG_READ/WRITE/OP, for readability.
>
> A length expressed as an explicit constant is also re-expressed as the size
> of the buffer, when this is possible.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that ma
On 08/10/12 02:38, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall
>
> Introduce use of I2c_MSG_READ/WRITE/OP, for readability.
>
> A length expressed as an explicit constant is also re-expressed as the size
> of the buffer, when this is possible.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that ma
On 08/10/12 03:44, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2012, walter harms wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 07.10.2012 17:38, schrieb Julia Lawall:
>>> From: Julia Lawall
>>>
>>> Introduce use of I2c_MSG_READ/WRITE/OP, for readability.
>>>
>>> In the second i2c_msg structure, a length expressed as an explicit
On 08/10/12 08:39, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 20:56 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
Some people thought that it would be nice to have the macros rather than
the inlined field initializations, especially since there is no flag for
write. A separate question is whether an a
On 05/17/2011 08:59 PM, Wu, Josh wrote:
>
> On Friday, May 13, 2011 5:25 AM, Ryan Mallon wrote
>
>> On 05/12/2011 07:42 PM, Josh Wu wrote:
>>> This patch is to enable Atmel Image Sensor Interface (ISI) driver support.
>>> - Using soc-camera framework wi
it
> were, you'd have to revamp half of the kernel.
It should at least be consistent within a file, which it is not true in
this case. I think the preferred style is to have the variable on the left.
~Ryan
--
Bluewater Systems Ltd - ARM Technology Solution Centre
Ryan Mallon
On 05/12/2011 07:42 PM, Josh Wu wrote:
> This patch is to enable Atmel Image Sensor Interface (ISI) driver support.
> - Using soc-camera framework with videobuf2 dma-contig allocator
> - Supporting video streaming of YUV packed format
> - Tested on AT91SAM9M10G45-EK with OV2640
Hi Josh,
Thansk f
10 matches
Mail list logo