On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 09:19:47PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> Just thought to take opinion for documentation before placing it in v3.
> Does it looks fine ?
>
> +/**
> + * __vm_insert_range - insert range of kernel pages into user vma
> + * @vma: user vma to map to
> + * @pages: pointer to a
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 03:34:56PM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > +int vm_insert_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> > + struct page **pages, unsigned long page_count)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long uaddr = addr;
> > + int ret = 0, i;
>
> Some of the sites bei
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 04:19:11AM -0700, William Kucharski wrote:
> Could you add a line to the description explicitly stating that a failure
> to insert any page in the range will fail the entire routine, something
> like:
>
> > * This allows drivers to insert range of kernel pages they've alloc
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 12:26:38PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:59 PM Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > + * vm_insert_range - insert range of kernel pages into user vma
> > > + * @vma: user vma to map to
> > > + * @addr: target user address of this page
> > > + * @pages: po
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:00:30AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:44 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 11/15/18 7:45 AM, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> > What is the opposite of vm_insert_range() or even of vm_insert_page()?
> > or is there no need for that?
>
> There is no op
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:49:19PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> Use new return type vm_fault_t for fault handler. For
> now, this is just documenting that the function returns
> a VM_FAULT value rather than an errno. Once all instances
> are converted, vm_fault_t will become a distinct type.
>
r += hweight8(*ptr);
n--;
ptr++;
}
BUG_ON(n >= INT_MAX / 8)
return r + bitmap_weight((unsigned long *)ptr, n * 8);
}
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you&#
