Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] video: exynos_dp: Use the generic PHY driver

2013-06-28 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 12:35 Fri 28 Jun , Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 04:18:23PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote: > > Use the generic PHY API instead of the platform callback to control > > the DP PHY. The 'phy_label' field is added to the platform data > > structure to allow PHY lookup on non-dt platfor

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] at91: add Atmel ISI and ov2640 support on sam9m10/sam9g45 board.

2011-09-23 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 09:35 Thu 22 Sep , Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Josh Wu wrote: > > > This patch > > 1. add ISI_MCK parent setting code when add ISI device. > > 2. add ov2640 support on board file. > > 3. define isi_mck clock in sam9g45 chip file. > > > > Signed-off-by: Josh Wu > >

Re: [PATCH v2] [media] at91: add code to initialize and manage the ISI_MCK for Atmel ISI driver.

2011-09-15 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 23:08 Tue 06 Sep , Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > On 09/06/2011 10:05 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > >> I'm not entirely sure on this one, but as we had a similar situation with > >> clocks, we decided to extablish the clock hierarchy in the board cod

Re: [PATCH v2] [media] at91: add code to initialize and manage the ISI_MCK for Atmel ISI driver.

2011-09-06 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 08:54 Tue 06 Sep , Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, Josh Wu wrote: > > > This patch enable the configuration for ISI_MCK, which is provided by > > programmable clock. > > > > Signed-off-by: Josh Wu > > --- > > drivers/media/video/atmel-isi.c | 60 > > +++

Re: [PATCH] at91: add Atmel ISI and ov2640 support on m10/g45 board.

2011-09-06 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 16:55 Mon 05 Sep , Wu, Josh wrote: > > > On 09/03/2011 2:22 AM Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > >> > >> #include > >> #include > >> @@ -194,6 +197,95 @@ static void __init ek_add_device_nand(

Re: [PATCH] at91: add Atmel ISI and ov2640 support on m10/g45 board.

2011-09-02 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> > #include > #include > @@ -194,6 +197,95 @@ static void __init ek_add_device_nand(void) > at91_add_device_nand(&ek_nand_data); > } > > +/* > + * ISI > + */ > +#if defined(CONFIG_VIDEO_ATMEL_ISI) || defined(CONFIG_VIDEO_ATMEL_ISI_MODULE) > +static struct isi_platform_data __initda

Re: [PATCH v4] [media] at91: add Atmel Image Sensor Interface (ISI) support

2011-06-08 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
; > Signed-off-by: Josh Wu looks fine Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Best Regards, J. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v2] [media] at91: add Atmel Image Sensor Interface (ISI) support

2011-05-27 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
ctx; > + > + isi->sequence = 0; > + isi->active = NULL; > + > + dev_dbg(icd->dev.parent, "%s, count=%d, size=%ld\n", __func__, > + *nbuffers, size); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int buffer_init(struct vb2_buffer *vb

Re: [PATCH] [media] at91: add Atmel Image Sensor Interface (ISI) support

2011-05-17 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 08:58 Wed 18 May , Ryan Mallon wrote: > On 05/17/2011 08:59 PM, Wu, Josh wrote: > > > > On Friday, May 13, 2011 5:25 AM, Ryan Mallon wrote > > > >> On 05/12/2011 07:42 PM, Josh Wu wrote: > >>> This patch is to enable Atmel Image Sensor Interface (ISI) driver > >>> support. > >>> - Using

Re: [PATCH] [media] at91: add Atmel Image Sensor Interface (ISI) support

2011-05-12 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> > + > > +/* Constants for RGB_CFG(ISI_V2) */ > > +#define ISI_V2_RGB_CFG_DEFAULT 0 > > +#define ISI_V2_RGB_CFG_MODE_1 1 > > +#define ISI_V2_RGB_CFG_MODE_2 2 > > +#define ISI_V2_RGB_CFG_MODE_3 3 > > + > > +/* Bit ma

Re: [PATCH] [media] at91: add Atmel Image Sensor Interface (ISI) support

2011-05-12 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> +struct atmel_isi; do we really this here? > + > +enum atmel_isi_pixfmt { > + ATMEL_ISI_PIXFMT_GREY, /* Greyscale */ > + ATMEL_ISI_PIXFMT_CbYCrY, > + ATMEL_ISI_PIXFMT_CrYCbY, > + ATMEL_ISI_PIXFMT_YCbYCr, > + ATMEL_ISI_PIXFMT_YCrYCb, > + ATMEL_ISI_PIXFMT_RGB24, > +