On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> Chris, mind applying this one too? It removes more lines than it adds
> while fixing things, by removing the helper function that isn't good
> at anoymous unions, and using another one that does this all right..
The patch is applied. I add
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> For all my test cases:
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil
>
All 3 test cases added.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> Chris, can you please add this to the test cases since Hans did the
> work to create a nice small test-case?
Sure, I want to add them to the test case.
Hans, May I get a signed-off
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> But then when we look up a symbol, we only look at the latest one, so
> when we size the array, we look at that "extern" declaration, and
> don't see the size that was created with the initializer.
Exactly. Sparse need to handle merging of
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Is there any chance that the three issues I reported will be fixed? If not,
> then I'll work around it in the kernel code.
>
Most likely it is a sparse issue. Can you generate a minimal stand alone
test case that expose this bug? I try to sim
