RE: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: S5PV210: Remove camera support from mach-goni.c

2014-05-01 Thread Kukjin Kim
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > > S5PV210 is going to get DT support, so we can remove the camera > bits from the only board using camera on S5PV210. This allows to > clean the exynos4-is driver by dropping code for non-dt platforms. > This patch can be dropped if a patch removing the whole board > fi

Re: [PATCH v2 00/26] OMAP3 ISP: Move to videobuf2

2014-05-01 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi Laurent, On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 02:28:46PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > This is the second version of the patch set that ports the OMAP3 ISP driver to > the videobuf2 framework. I've tried to keep patches small and reviewable > (24/25 is a bit too big for my taste, but splitting it further

Conexant 25858

2014-05-01 Thread John Francis
Hi Folks - is there any interest/hope in developing a driver for the Conexant 25854/25858? Barriers? The options for high-performing multiple camera PCIe cards on Linux are very limited. Cards based on the the 25858 are cheap and available by the bucketload. I noticed the 25854/8 mentioned on the

Re: [PATCH v2 01/26] omap3isp: stat: Rename IS_COHERENT_BUF to ISP_STAT_USES_DMAENGINE

2014-05-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Sakari, On Thursday 01 May 2014 14:15:42 Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 12:48:57AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Sakari, > > > > On Thursday 01 May 2014 01:45:47 Sakari Ailus wrote: > > > Hi Laurent, > > > > > > Thanks for the set! I've been looking forward to see this!

Re: [PATCH 1/4] drivers/base: add managed token devres interfaces

2014-05-01 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:49:23PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > +/* creates a token devres and marks it available */ > +int devm_token_create(struct device *dev, const char *id) > +{ > + struct token_devres *tkn; > + size_t tkn_size; > + > + tkn_size = sizeof(struct token_devres)

Re: [PATCH v2 01/26] omap3isp: stat: Rename IS_COHERENT_BUF to ISP_STAT_USES_DMAENGINE

2014-05-01 Thread Sakari Ailus
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 12:48:57AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Sakari, > > On Thursday 01 May 2014 01:45:47 Sakari Ailus wrote: > > Hi Laurent, > > > > Thanks for the set! I've been looking forward to see this! :) > > > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 02:28:47PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] drivers/base: Generic framework for tracking internal interfaces

2014-05-01 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:04:19AM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > 2. You replace calls of component_add and component_del with calls > to interface_tracker_ifup(dev, INTERFACE_TRACKER_TYPE_COMPONENT, > &specific_component_ops), > or interface_tracker_ifdown. > Thats all for components. How does t

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] drivers/base: Generic framework for tracking internal interfaces

2014-05-01 Thread Andrzej Hajda
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote, On 01.05.2014 00:28: On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:42:09PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: The main problem with component framework is that componentization significantly changes every driver and changes it in a way which is not compatible with traditional drivers, so d