RE: [PATCH v3 0/5] ARM: davinci: re-arrange definitions to have a common davinci header

2011-12-01 Thread Hadli, Manjunath
Sekhar, On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 17:07:21, Nori, Sekhar wrote: > Hi Manju, > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 15:48:53, Hadli, Manjunath wrote: > > Re-arrange definitions and remove unnecessary code so that we canx > > These are two different things and should be done in separate patches. Sergei > has

PCTV452e / S2-3600 displays I2C error

2011-12-01 Thread Neil Sutton
Hi all, I'm not entirely sure if this is the correct list, but I compiled the latest 3.2 RC3 kernel to get native support of my S2-3600 tuner (s2-liplianin seems to cause trouble with my other tuner). I enabled the PCTV452e module in the kernel and the device detects ok; [   12.075239] dvb-usb:

Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] mfd: twl6040: Fix wrong TWL6040_GPO3 bitfield value

2011-12-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Sergio, On Thursday 01 December 2011 18:35:20 Aguirre, Sergio wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thursday 01 December 2011 01:14:51 Sergio Aguirre wrote: > >> The define should be the result of 1 << Bit number. > >> > >> Bit number for GPOCTL.GPO3 field is

Re: LinuxTV ported to Windows

2011-12-01 Thread Steven Toth
>> Speaking as the maintainer and copyright owner I can say that it would >> have been nice if someone had contacted me privately re the matter, >> before hand. Not to assert any legal right, not for any approval, >> simply as a courtesy and a perhaps a small 'Thank You'. NetUp could >> have happil

Re: LinuxTV ported to Windows

2011-12-01 Thread Andreas Oberritter
Hello Steven, On 01.12.2011 22:18, Steven Toth wrote: >>> The point I'm trying to make: Someone made a presumably nice open source >>> port to a new platform and the first thing you're doing is to play the >>> GPL-has-been-violated-card, even though you're admitting that you don't >>> know whether

Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?

2011-12-01 Thread Andreas Oberritter
On 01.12.2011 21:38, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > I fail to see where do you need to duplicate dvb-core. An userspace > LD_PRELOAD handler that would do: > > int socket; > > int dvb_ioctl(int fd, unsigned long int request, ...) > { > void *arg; > va_list ap; > > va_sta

Re: LinuxTV ported to Windows

2011-12-01 Thread Andreas Oberritter
Hello Laurent, On 01.12.2011 20:42, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Wednesday 30 November 2011 20:58:40 Andreas Oberritter wrote: >> On 30.11.2011 20:33, Devin Heitmueller wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > Am I the only one who thinks this is

Re: [PATCH] omap_vout: Fix compile error in 3.1

2011-12-01 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2011-12-01 12:06, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi Gary, On Thursday 01 December 2011 13:51:09 Gary Thomas wrote: This patch is against the mainline v3.1 release (c3b92c8) and fixes a compile error when building for OMAP3+DSS+VOUT Thanks for the patch. Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart In the future,

[PATCH] it913x add retry to USB bulk endpoints and IO.

2011-12-01 Thread Malcolm Priestley
This a bus repeater for it913x devices. Commands usually fail because of other activity on the USB bus. Bulk failures that report -ETIMEDOUT or -EBUSY are repeated. Enpoints that return actlen not equal len request -EAGAIN. The retry is set at 10. Signed-off-by: Malcolm Priestley --- drivers/

Re: LinuxTV ported to Windows

2011-12-01 Thread Steven Toth
>> The point I'm trying to make: Someone made a presumably nice open source >> port to a new platform and the first thing you're doing is to play the >> GPL-has-been-violated-card, even though you're admitting that you don't >> know whether any right is being violated or not. Please don't do that.

Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?

2011-12-01 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On 01-12-2011 17:59, HoP wrote: 2011/12/1 Mauro Carvalho Chehab: On 01-12-2011 12:58, HoP wrote: Hi, let me ask you some details of your interesting idea (how to achieve the same functionality as with vtunerc driver): [...] The driver, as proposed, is not really a driver, as it doesn't sup

Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?

2011-12-01 Thread HoP
2011/12/1 Mauro Carvalho Chehab : > On 01-12-2011 12:58, HoP wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> let me ask you some details of your interesting idea (how to >> achieve the same functionality as with vtunerc driver): >> >> [...] >> >>> The driver, as proposed, is not really a driver, as it doesn't support >>> a

Re: LinuxTV ported to Windows

2011-12-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Andreas, On Wednesday 30 November 2011 20:58:40 Andreas Oberritter wrote: > On 30.11.2011 20:33, Devin Heitmueller wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > >>> Am I the only one who thinks this is a legally ambigious grey area? > >>> Seems like this could be a vio

Re: Debug output

2011-12-01 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On 01-12-2011 17:01, damateem wrote: Ok, if I set debug as follows vfd->debug =V4L2_DEBUG_IOCTL | V4L2_DEBUG_IOCTL_ARG; I can see the debug trace in dmesg, but this doesn't seem like the correct way to set the flags. In general, what it is none is to add a debug modprobe parameter that would

Re: [PATCH] omap_vout: Fix compile error in 3.1

2011-12-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Gary, On Thursday 01 December 2011 13:51:09 Gary Thomas wrote: > This patch is against the mainline v3.1 release (c3b92c8) and > fixes a compile error when building for OMAP3+DSS+VOUT Thanks for the patch. Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart In the future, could you please send patches inlined inste

Re: Debug output

2011-12-01 Thread damateem
Ok, if I set debug as follows vfd->debug =V4L2_DEBUG_IOCTL | V4L2_DEBUG_IOCTL_ARG; I can see the debug trace in dmesg, but this doesn't seem like the correct way to set the flags. What is the typical method of setting these debug flags? Is this the best place to ask these type of questions? Th

Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?

2011-12-01 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On 01-12-2011 12:58, HoP wrote: Hi, let me ask you some details of your interesting idea (how to achieve the same functionality as with vtunerc driver): [...] The driver, as proposed, is not really a driver, as it doesn't support any hardware. The kernel driver would be used to just copy data

cron job: media_tree daily build: ERRORS

2011-12-01 Thread Hans Verkuil
This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds media_tree for the kernels and architectures in the list below. Results of the daily build of media_tree: date:Thu Dec 1 19:02:09 CET 2011 git hash:2a887d27708a4f9f3b5ad8258f9e19a150b58f03 gcc version: i686-linux-gcc (GCC

Re: [PATCH v2] Add smsspi driver to support Siano SPI connected device

2011-12-01 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi Doron, Thanks for the patch. I have some comments on it besides those what Mauro already gave you. On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 01:33:53PM +0200, Doron Cohen wrote: > > From 80d279ec11492ca6729f1421983f52b8e7144cd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Doron Cohen > Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 17:47:12 +03

Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] TWL6030: Add mapping for auxiliary regs

2011-12-01 Thread Aguirre, Sergio
Hi Balaji, Thanks for the review. On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:58 AM, T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Sergio Aguirre wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Sergio Aguirre >> --- >>  drivers/mfd/twl-core.c |    2 +- >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] v4l2: OMAP4 ISS driver + Sensor + Board support

2011-12-01 Thread Aguirre, Sergio
Hi Laurent, On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Sergio, > > On Thursday 01 December 2011 01:14:49 Sergio Aguirre wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> This is the second version of the OMAP4 ISS driver, >> now ported to the Media Controller framework AND supporting >> videobuf2 f

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] v4l2: OMAP4 ISS driver + Sensor + Board support

2011-12-01 Thread Aguirre, Sergio
Hi Sakari, On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Sergio, > > Thanks for the patchset!! And thanks for your attention :) > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 06:14:49PM -0600, Sergio Aguirre wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> This is the second version of the OMAP4 ISS driver, >> now ported

Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] mfd: twl6040: Fix wrong TWL6040_GPO3 bitfield value

2011-12-01 Thread Aguirre, Sergio
Hi Laurent, Thanks for the review. On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Sergio, > > On Thursday 01 December 2011 01:14:51 Sergio Aguirre wrote: >> The define should be the result of 1 << Bit number. >> >> Bit number for GPOCTL.GPO3 field is 2, which results >> in 0x4 val

Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] OMAP4: Add base addresses for ISS

2011-12-01 Thread Aguirre, Sergio
Hi Laurent, Thanks for the review. On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Sergio, > > On Thursday 01 December 2011 01:14:54 Sergio Aguirre wrote: >> NOTE: This isn't the whole list of features that the >> ISS supports, but the only ones supported at the moment. >> >> Signe

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] v4l2: OMAP4 ISS driver + Sensor + Board support

2011-12-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Sergio, On Thursday 01 December 2011 01:14:49 Sergio Aguirre wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This is the second version of the OMAP4 ISS driver, > now ported to the Media Controller framework AND supporting > videobuf2 framework. Thanks a lot for working on this. > This patchset should apply clean

Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] mfd: twl6040: Fix wrong TWL6040_GPO3 bitfield value

2011-12-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Sergio, On Thursday 01 December 2011 01:14:51 Sergio Aguirre wrote: > The define should be the result of 1 << Bit number. > > Bit number for GPOCTL.GPO3 field is 2, which results > in 0x4 value. > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Aguirre > --- > include/linux/mfd/twl6040.h |2 +- > 1 files chang

Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] OMAP4: Add base addresses for ISS

2011-12-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Sergio, On Thursday 01 December 2011 01:14:54 Sergio Aguirre wrote: > NOTE: This isn't the whole list of features that the > ISS supports, but the only ones supported at the moment. > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Aguirre > --- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 32 >

Re: Support for multiple section feeds with same PIDs

2011-12-01 Thread Andreas Oberritter
On 01.12.2011 16:57, Hamad Kadmany wrote: > Hello Andreas > >> On 01.12.2011 16:30, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > >> Yes. Feel free to enhance the demux API to your needs in order to fully >> support the features of your hardware. > > I have another question in that regard: Actually, multiple fil

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] v4l2: OMAP4 ISS driver + Sensor + Board support

2011-12-01 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi Sergio, Thanks for the patchset!! On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 06:14:49PM -0600, Sergio Aguirre wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This is the second version of the OMAP4 ISS driver, > now ported to the Media Controller framework AND supporting > videobuf2 framework. > > This patchset should apply cleanly

Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] TWL6030: Add mapping for auxiliary regs

2011-12-01 Thread T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Sergio Aguirre wrote: > Signed-off-by: Sergio Aguirre > --- >  drivers/mfd/twl-core.c |    2 +- >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c > index bfbd660..e26b564 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/

RE: Support for multiple section feeds with same PIDs

2011-12-01 Thread Hamad Kadmany
Hello Andreas > On 01.12.2011 16:30, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > Yes. Feel free to enhance the demux API to your needs in order to fully > support the features of your hardware. I have another question in that regard: Actually, multiple filter with same PID is assumed to be possible in case we

Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?

2011-12-01 Thread HoP
Hi, let me ask you some details of your interesting idea (how to achieve the same functionality as with vtunerc driver): [...] > The driver, as proposed, is not really a driver, as it doesn't support any > hardware. The kernel driver would be used to just copy data from one > userspace Please s

Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device

2011-12-01 Thread HoP
Hi > On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 22:38:33 +0100, HoP wrote: >> I have one big problem with it. I can even imagine that some "bad guys" >> could abuse virtual driver to use it for distribution close-source > drivers >> in the binary blobs. But is it that - worrying about bad boys abusing - >> the sufficie

Re: [PATCH] omap3isp: video: Don't WARN() on unknown pixel formats

2011-12-01 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi Laurent, On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:26:07AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Wednesday 30 November 2011 09:35:38 Sakari Ailus wrote: > > Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Monday 28 November 2011 17:01:12 Sakari Ailus wrote: > > >> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:37:34PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wro

[RFC] On controlling sensors

2011-12-01 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi all, I've been working a few years with digital cameras and Linux and come to the conclusion that the way the sensors are typically configured through V4L2 subdevs is far from optimal for the use of the low level software that typically accesses it, nor we make efficient use of the standard V4

Re: Support for multiple section feeds with same PIDs

2011-12-01 Thread Andreas Oberritter
On 01.12.2011 15:22, Hamad Kadmany wrote: > Hello Andreas > > On 01.12.2011 15:58, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > >> No. dvb_demux will do the extra filtering. Userspace won't notice. > > Got it now, thanks. The one downside I see to this is that the feed will be > stopped momentarily (dvb_dmxdev_f

RE: Support for multiple section feeds with same PIDs

2011-12-01 Thread Hamad Kadmany
Hello Andreas On 01.12.2011 15:58, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > No. dvb_demux will do the extra filtering. Userspace won't notice. Got it now, thanks. The one downside I see to this is that the feed will be stopped momentarily (dvb_dmxdev_feed_stop) before new filter is allocated that have the sa

Re: Support for multiple section feeds with same PIDs

2011-12-01 Thread Andreas Oberritter
On 01.12.2011 14:55, Hamad Kadmany wrote: > So if I understand correctly due to HW limitations back then, if in > user-space we want to get data of two PSI tables that share the same PID, we > could only setup one section filter with that PID and the user-space needs > to do the extra filtering (to

RE: Support for multiple section feeds with same PIDs

2011-12-01 Thread Hamad Kadmany
Hello Andreas So if I understand correctly due to HW limitations back then, if in user-space we want to get data of two PSI tables that share the same PID, we could only setup one section filter with that PID and the user-space needs to do the extra filtering (to parse and separate the sections be

Re: Support for multiple section feeds with same PIDs

2011-12-01 Thread Andreas Oberritter
Hello Hamad, On 29.11.2011 09:05, Hamad Kadmany wrote: > Question on the current behavior of dvb_dmxdev_filter_start (dmxdev.c) > > In case of DMXDEV_TYPE_SEC, the code restricts of having multiple sections > feeds allocated (allocate_section_feed) with same PID. From my experience, > application

Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] arm: omap4panda: Add support for omap4iss camera

2011-12-01 Thread Aguirre, Sergio
Hi Vaibhav, Thanks for the comments. On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- >> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Aguirre, Sergio >> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 5:45 AM >> To:

Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] OMAP4: hwmod: Include CSI2A and CSIPHY1 memory sections

2011-12-01 Thread Aguirre, Sergio
Hi Vaibhav, Thanks for the comments. On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media- >> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Aguirre, Sergio >> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 5:45 AM >> To

DVB-T Muxes Germany / Berlin outdated, please update...

2011-12-01 Thread Barts Builder
Problem: The Muxes from 'Network by Location' of tvheadend are outdated for Germany / Berlin. tvheadend bugtracker answer: Please report outdated mux information the the linux-media mailing list. Tvheadend is taking the list from the dvb-apps initial tuning files as the basis for the list of dv

[PATCH] omap_vout: Fix compile error in 3.1

2011-12-01 Thread Gary Thomas
This patch is against the mainline v3.1 release (c3b92c8) and fixes a compile error when building for OMAP3+DSS+VOUT -- Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates |Embedded world --

Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device

2011-12-01 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
Hello, On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 22:38:33 +0100, HoP wrote: > I have one big problem with it. I can even imagine that some "bad guys" > could abuse virtual driver to use it for distribution close-source drivers > in the binary blobs. But is it that - worrying about bad boys abusing - > the su

RE: Thanks

2011-12-01 Thread Song Li
l am a Staff of Hang Seng Bank HongKong, I do not know if we can work together in transferring $19,500,000.USD from my bank. Finally if you are interested I shall provide you with more details. my private Email: mrsong.l...@yahoo.cn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lin

Communication misunderstanding? (was: Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?)

2011-12-01 Thread Patrick Boettcher
(stripped LKML) On Thursday 01 December 2011 01:09:28 Andreas Oberritter wrote: > [..] > Regarding the kernellabs.com people[3] lobbying against your > contribution: > [..] KernelLabs is not a collections of politicians who want to change the world together whatever the costs. We are profession

Re: Support for multiple section feeds with same PIDs

2011-12-01 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On 01-12-2011 04:23, Hamad Kadmany wrote: Hi, Sorry to repeat the question, anyone has an idea on this? I appreciate your feedback. Thank you Hamad -Original Message- From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Hamad Kadmany Sent: Tue

Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?

2011-12-01 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On 30-11-2011 22:09, Andreas Oberritter wrote: On 30.11.2011 22:38, HoP wrote: Hi folks. I need to warn you that my mail is a bit little longer then I would like to be.But I'm not able to ask my question without some background information. On June 19th, I was sending the driver to the Linux-m

[PATCH/RFC v2 2/4] m5mols: Add support for buffer size configuration for compressed formats

2011-12-01 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
Use new struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt framesamples field to return maximum size of data transmitted per single frame. The framesamples value is adjusted according to pixel format and configured at the ISP registers. Except the pixel width and height, the frame size can also be made dependent on JPEG i

[PATCH/RFC v2 1/4] v4l: Add new framesamples field to struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt

2011-12-01 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
The purpose of the new field is to allow the video pipeline elements to negotiate memory buffer size for compressed data frames, where the buffer size cannot be derived from pixel width and height and the pixel code. For VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_FMT and VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_FMT ioctls, the framesamples paramete

[PATCH/RFC v2 4/4] v4l: Update subdev drivers to handle framesamples parameter

2011-12-01 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
Update the sub-device drivers having a devnode enabled so they properly handle the new framesamples field of struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt. These drivers don't support compressed (entropy encoded) formats so the framesamples field is simply initialized to 0. There is a few other drivers that expose a

[PATCH/RFC v2 3/4] s5p-fimc: Add support for media bus framesamples parameter

2011-12-01 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
The framesamples field of struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt is used to retrieve an exact required maximum memory buffer size for a compressed data frame from the sensor subdev. This allows to avoid allocating huge buffers in the host driver. To make sure the size of allocated buffers is correct for a subd

[RFC v2] v4l2: Compressed data formats on the video bus

2011-12-01 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
Hello, this is an updated version of the changeset extending struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt with new framesamples field. Changes since v1: - Docbook documentation improvements - drivers that are exposing a sub-device node are modified to initialize the new struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt member to 0 if