Re: [REVIEWv2] bttv v4l2_subdev conversion

2009-03-20 Thread Trent Piepho
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Please note that the somewhat awkward i2c address lists are temporary. This should be mentioned in the patch description. No one in the future wondering why these address lists are here is going to find this email message. I know they're supposed to go

Re: Results of the 'dropping support for kernels <2.6.22' poll

2009-03-20 Thread Trent Piepho
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:03:21 -0400 > Devin Heitmueller wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab > > wrote: > > > My suggestion is to keep a backporting system, but more targeted at the > > > end-users. The reasons are

Re: Results of the 'dropping support for kernels <2.6.22' poll

2009-03-20 Thread Trent Piepho
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Devin Heitmueller wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab > wrote: > > My suggestion is to keep a backporting system, but more targeted at the > > end-users. The reasons are the ones explained above. Basically: > > Ok, so just so we're all on the same p

Re: Failure to read saa7134/saa6752hs MPEG output

2009-03-20 Thread hermann pitton
Hi, Am Freitag, den 20.03.2009, 14:24 -0600 schrieb Gordon Smith: > Hello - > > I'm unable to read or stream compressed data from saa7134/saa6752hs. > > I have a RTD Technologies VFG7350 (saa7134 based, two channel, > hardware encoder per channel, no tuner) running current v4l-dvb in > debian 2.

Re: Results of the 'dropping support for kernels <2.6.22' poll

2009-03-20 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:03:21 -0400 Devin Heitmueller wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab > wrote: > > My suggestion is to keep a backporting system, but more targeted at the > > end-users. The reasons are the ones explained above. Basically: > > Ok, so just so we're

Re: Results of the 'dropping support for kernels <2.6.22' poll

2009-03-20 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > My suggestion is to keep a backporting system, but more targeted at the > end-users. The reasons are the ones explained above. Basically: Ok, so just so we're all on the same page - we're telling all the developers not willing to run

Re: HD PVR question

2009-03-20 Thread Janne Grunau
Hi Simon, answering to linux-media@vger.kernel.org since such things should be asked and archieved on a mailing list. On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 02:23:33AM +0100, Simon Peter wrote: > > is there a way to set the resolution to 720x576 in the Linux driver > when capturing S-Video? If you feed a pal

Re: [linux-dvb] FusionHDTV7 and v4l causes kernel panic

2009-03-20 Thread Andy Walls
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 11:22 -0700, Timothy D. Lenz wrote: > Not sure where I was suposed to reply to. When replying I find the replys are > coming from diffrent lists and out look is picking > that up. At the bottom it says v4l related stuff should go to > linux-media@vger.kernel.org, but the thr

Re: [patch review] radio/Kconfig: introduce 3 groups: isa, pci, and others drivers

2009-03-20 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Trent Piepho wrote: > On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:18:47 +0300 > > Alexey Klimov wrote: > > over what we currently have on our complex Kbuilding system. > > > > For the out-of-system building, one alternativ

Re: Results of the 'dropping support for kernels <2.6.22' poll

2009-03-20 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:47:07 +0100 "Hans Werner" wrote: > > That's said, the backport tree is still an experimental work. The scripts > > require more time to be tested, and the Makefiles need some cleanups. > > Mauro, > > neat, but I still think time spent on backporting work would be better >

Re: [linux-dvb] FusionHDTV7 and v4l causes kernel panic

2009-03-20 Thread Andy Walls
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 11:22 -0700, Timothy D. Lenz wrote: > Not sure where I was suposed to reply to. When replying I find the replys are > coming from diffrent lists and out look is picking > that up. At the bottom it says v4l related stuff should go to > linux-media@vger.kernel.org, but the thr

Re: Results of the 'dropping support for kernels <2.6.22' poll

2009-03-20 Thread Hans Werner
> Hans, > > On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 22:18:24 +0100 > Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > In the final analysis I'm the boss of my own time. And I've decided that > > once the conversion of all the i2c modules is finished I'll stop > spending > > time on the compatibility code for kernels <2.6.22 as it is simp

Re: The right way to interpret the content of SNR, signal strength and BER from HVR 4000 Lite

2009-03-20 Thread Trent Piepho
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Devin Heitmueller wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Trent Piepho wrote: > >> The argument being put forth is based on the relative efficiency of > >> the multiply versus divide opcodes on modern CPU architectures?? ?And > > > > Maybe I just like writing efficient code

[cron job] v4l-dvb daily build 2.6.22 and up: ERRORS, 2.6.16-2.6.21: ERRORS

2009-03-20 Thread Hans Verkuil
This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds v4l-dvb for the kernels and architectures in the list below. Results of the daily build of v4l-dvb: date:Fri Mar 20 19:00:05 CET 2009 path:http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb changeset: 11126:61d2e6e33e90 gcc version: gcc (

Re: ISP Configuration for RAW Bayer sensor

2009-03-20 Thread Suresh Rao
Hi Sergio, Thanks for the update. Sure, I love to get hands on it. Regards, Suresh On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media- >> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of S

Re: The right way to interpret the content of SNR, signal strength and BER from HVR 4000 Lite

2009-03-20 Thread VDR User
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Manu Abraham wrote: > Well, that said positioning could be explained for those who on't > have an understanding on how to do it. > > Let's assume, currently at position "X" there is no signal, no > frontend LOCK. You can move the antenna to the approximate X-Y > c

Re: [linux-dvb] Linux driver for Hauppauge WinTV-HVR 950Q

2009-03-20 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Steven Toth wrote: > > ZhanMa wrote: >> Hi Steven, >> >> I am working on porting the Hauppauge WinTV-Hvr 950Q tuner driver to a >> TI DaVinci platform which uses linux kernel 2.6.18 (MontaVista). After I >> pluged in the tuner into the board's usb port, I got the

Re: The right way to interpret the content of SNR, signal strength and BER from HVR 4000 Lite

2009-03-20 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Trent Piepho wrote: >> The argument being put forth is based on the relative efficiency of >> the multiply versus divide opcodes on modern CPU architectures??  And > > Maybe I just like writing efficient code to do interesting things? Wow, um, ok. You realize tha

Re: The right way to interpret the content of SNR, signal strength and BER from HVR 4000 Lite

2009-03-20 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Manu Abraham wrote: > When you position an antenna, you do not get a LOCK in most cases. > The signal statistics for any demodulator are valid only with a > frontend LOCK. This is absolutely true, and a very common problem in the drivers (at least with the ATSC/QA

RE: [PATCH 3/3] V4L2 Driver for OMAP3/3 DSS.

2009-03-20 Thread Shah, Hardik
> -Original Message- > From: Alexey Klimov [mailto:klimov.li...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 6:02 PM > To: Shah, Hardik > Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org; linux-o...@vger.kernel.org; Jadav, Brijesh R; > Hiremath, Vaibhav > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] V4L2 Driver for OMAP3/3 DSS.

Re: [PATCH 3/3] V4L2 Driver for OMAP3/3 DSS.

2009-03-20 Thread Alexey Klimov
Hello again, my previous message due to bad connection was send with no end. Sorry about that. > +               vout->vid = k; > +               vid_dev->vouts[k] = vout; > +               vout->vid_info.vid_dev = vid_dev; > +               vout->vid_info.overlays[0] = vid_dev->overlays[k + 1];

Re: [PATCH 3/3] V4L2 Driver for OMAP3/3 DSS.

2009-03-20 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 20 mrt 2009, om 06:20 heeft Hardik Shah het volgende geschreven: --- a/drivers/media/video/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/media/video/Kconfig @@ -711,6 +711,26 @@ config VIDEO_CAFE_CCIC CMOS camera controller. This is the controller found on first- generation OLPC systems. +#con

RE: [PATCH 3/3] V4L2 Driver for OMAP3/3 DSS.

2009-03-20 Thread Shah, Hardik
> -Original Message- > From: Koen Kooi [mailto:k.k...@student.utwente.nl] > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 2:34 PM > To: Shah, Hardik > Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org; linux-o...@vger.kernel.org; Jadav, Brijesh R; > Hiremath, Vaibhav > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] V4L2 Driver for OMAP3/3 DSS.

Re: [linux-dvb] Weird TS Stream from DMX_SET_PES_FILTER

2009-03-20 Thread Brice Dubost
Bob Ingraham wrote: > Hello, > > I've been using the Linux DVB API to grab DBV-S MPEG2 video packets using a > TechniSat S2 card. > > But something seems odd about DMX_SET_PES_FILTER. > > It returns a TS packets for my pid just fine, but by MPEG2 frames have no PES > headers! The raw compress

Re: About white balance control.

2009-03-20 Thread Bill Dirks
DO_WHITE_BALANCE is intended to do a one-shot white balance calibration and then hold it. So you would hold up, for example, a white piece of paper in front of the camera and click the do white balance. Then the white balance should be correct as long as the lighting doesn't change. This can wo

Re: Is v4l2 loopback needed in kernel? Invitation for code review

2009-03-20 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi Vasily! On Thursday 05 March 2009 22:13:24 vas...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, my v4l2 loopback device is now at working state: it can do > streaming and basic IO, works with Skype, luvcview and mplayer. next > feature planned is allowing multiply readers. > Benefits from having this driver are: v

Re: [PATCH 0/3] V4L2 driver for OMAP2/3 with new CIDs.

2009-03-20 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Friday 20 March 2009 06:18:44 Shah, Hardik wrote: > Hi All, > I will be posting series of three patches for the V4L2 driver on the > OMAP2/3 DSS. Thanks! I'll review this within the week. Regards, Hans > Patch 1 - > This is the second revision of the patch. > Documentation added for

Re: Some possible missing v4l2_subdev IOCTLs.

2009-03-20 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Friday 20 March 2009 03:24:49 Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto wrote: > Hi Hans, > > I did a quick analysis of the subdev, and noticed that some video ioctls > for the subdevices aren't there... > > [gs]_crop > [gs]_parm > enum_frameintervals > enum_framesizes > enum_fmt_cap > > I noticed this

Re: v4l2-subdev missing video ops

2009-03-20 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Friday 20 March 2009 00:55:20 Pete Eberlein wrote: > Hello Hans, > > I'm looking at converting the go7007 staging driver to use the subdev > API. Hoorah! :-) > I don't see any v4l2_subdev_video_ops for VIDIOC_S_INPUT nor > VIDIOC_S_STD. Were those overlooked, or should I use the generic > v